Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Liner Vs. Jafco, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 06, 1964

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. San Diego Building Trades Council Vs. Garmon US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1957
  2. Construction Laborers Vs. Curry US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1963
  3. Love Vs. Griffith US Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1924
  4. Liner v. Jafco
    Search
  5. Inc. - 375 U.S. 301 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Liner v. Jafco
    Search
  6. Inc., 375 U.S. 301 (1964) Liner v. Jafco
    Search
  7. to consider the validity of the injunction in light of our decision in Local No. 438, Local 438, Construction Laborers v. Curry
    Search
  8. case, the question of mootness is itself a question of federal law upon which we must pronounce final judgment. Love v. Griffith
    Search
  9. rights in the lower court, local rules as to how far it shall be reviewed on appeal do not necessarily prevail. Davis v. Wechsler
    Search
  10. is a question as to which Page 375 U. S. 305 the plaintiffs are entitled to invoke our judgment. Ward v. Love
    Search
  11. Fiswick v. United
    Search
  12. question may not be challenged here, the petitioners have no recourse against Jafco on the bond. Thus, unlike Love v. Griffith
    Search
  13. St. Pierre v. United
    Search
  14. conduct arguably protected or prohibited by the National Labor Relations Act. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  15. result from the application of disparate state remedies -- that only the federal agency shall deal with it. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  16. Board is not barred from granting appropriate remedies by the fact that the challenged conduct has ceased, Labor Board v. Mexia
    Search
  17. Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U. S. 563 , or that the construction has been completed, Local 74, Carpenters Union v. Labor
    Search
  18. in situations which the Congress has ordained shall be dealt with exclusively by the Board. In Construction Laborers v. Curry
    Search
  19. U.S. at 371 U. S. 550 . In Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson
    Search
  20. state common law rules. In such a case, our decision is not controlled Page 375 U. S. 309 by Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
    Search
  21. need not be extended, for, in our view, the case is squarely governed by our decision in Construction Laborers v. Curry
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Liner v. Jafco
    Search
  23. Davis v. Wechsler
    Search
  24. Ward v. Love
    Search
  25. the National Labor Relations Act. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  26. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  27. Labor Board v. Mexia
    Search
  28. Carpenters Union v. Labor
    Search
  29. the Board. In Construction Laborers v. Curry
    Search
  30. In Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson
    Search
  31. Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial