Citation network
Hardy Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 06, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hardy v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 375 U.S. 277 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Hardy v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 375 U.S. 277 (1964) Hardy v. UnitedSearch
-
leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court of Appeals, although empowered to allow the appeal ( Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
formulated by the indigent defendant pro se. See Ingram v. UnitedSearch
-
on certiorari. 373 U.S. 902. We deal with the federal system, where the appeal is a matter of right ( Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
gets, at public expense, as a minimum, the transcript which is relevant to the points of error assigned. Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Ingram v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 375 U. S. 281 The duty of counsel on appeal, as we noted in Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
allowance of an appeal should not be denied until an indigent has had adequate representation by counsel. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
see no escape from the conclusion that, either where the requirements of a nonfrivolous appeal prescribed by Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
sought to be made, and where counsel on appeal was not counsel at the trial, the requirements placed on him by Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that the case presents a nonfrivolous issue. Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
made by the defendant in his pro se application. Ingram v. UnitedSearch
-
Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
See Pannell v. UnitedSearch
-
Tatum v. UnitedSearch
-
Durham v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CurrensSearch
-
McDonald v. UnitedSearch
-
Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
cannot afford to purchase them would seem to be entirely consistent with the spirit of our recent decision in Bartone v. UnitedSearch
-
identical today, but the Court's interpretations have stripped them of the apparent congressional meaning. In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
At 352 U. S. 566 . In Farley v. UnitedSearch
-
to justify the conviction, and this Court required a transcript to be furnished on that point. A year later, in Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
the question of probable cause raised by petitioner could not necessarily be called frivolous. In 1962, in Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
a free transcript simply because those economically better situated can obtain their transcripts at will. See Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Eskridge v. WashingtonSearch
-
hesitate to promulgate blanket requirements on this subject based largely upon theoretical considerations. Cf. Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
remanding it to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of that court's subsequent decision in Ingram v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hardy v. UnitedSearch
-
See Ingram v. UnitedSearch
-
Tatum v. UnitedSearch
-
Bartone v. UnitedSearch
-
In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
In Farley v. UnitedSearch
-
See Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Sanders v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial