Citation network
United States Vs. Healy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 17, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 75 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. HealySearch
-
U.S. 75 (1964) United States v. HealySearch
-
the statute, as Gooch v. UnitedSearch
-
days of the judgment, we are not faced with an attempt to rejuvenate an extinguished right to appeal. Cf. Allegrucci v. UnitedSearch
-
latter is the well established rule in civil cases, whether brought here by appeal or certiorari, e.g., United States v. EllicottSearch
-
Morse v. UnitedSearch
-
by a criminal defendant is the unarticulated premise on which the Court has consistently proceeded. See, e.g., Panico v. UnitedSearch
-
Corey v. UnitedSearch
-
Genovese v. UnitedSearch
-
States, decided with Evola v. UnitedSearch
-
entered 16 days after denial of rehearing and rehearing en banc, 49 days after entry of original judgment). In Craig v. UnitedSearch
-
have recently recognized the appropriateness of petitions for rehearing by the United States in criminal cases, Forman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
as do similar petitions in civil cases and in criminal cases in which the Government has won below. United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. SmithSearch
-
Nor can the principle of strict construction of statutes permitting governmental appeals in criminal cases, Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
to require a motive of pecuniary profit, the District Court disregarded the plain holding of Gooch v. UnitedSearch
-
accord with the congressional purpose. The Courts of Appeals have consistently followed Gooch, e.g., United States v. ParkerSearch
-
Brooks v. UnitedSearch
-
Hayes v. UnitedSearch
-
intrinsically illegal purpose. Nothing in the reports or debates supports appellees' position. In two cases, Wheatley v. UnitedSearch
-
Bearden v. UnitedSearch
-
Chatwin v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. HealySearch
-
Gooch v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Allegrucci v. UnitedSearch
-
Panico v. UnitedSearch
-
Evola v. UnitedSearch
-
In Craig v. UnitedSearch
-
Forman v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
of Gooch v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ParkerSearch
-
Wheatley v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial