Citation network
Ungar Vs. Sarafite
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 30, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 575 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Ungar v. SarafiteSearch
-
U.S. 575 (1964) Ungar v. SarafiteSearch
-
in this Court on the constitutional issues raised and necessarily passed upon in the state courts. Bailey v. AndersonSearch
-
and sustained over constitutional objections. See Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. DavisSearch
-
Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. AldersonSearch
-
Anonymous v. BakerSearch
-
solely upon such disobedience to court orders and criticism of its rulings during the course of a trial. See Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
to be tried by an unbiased and impartial judge without a direct personal interest in the outcome of the hearing. Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
in camera grand jury proceedings, especially when the latter the founded upon perjury charges. Unlike Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 267 U. S. 517 , and Offutt v. UnitedSearch
-
without animosity, and petitioner's final intemperate outburst provoked no emotional reflex in the judge. See Fisher v. PaceSearch
-
against the charge. The State, among other arguments, denies Ungar's right to any hearing at all, relying upon Sacher v. UnitedSearch
-
that violates due process even if the party fails to offer evidence or is compelled to defend without counsel. Avery v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the face of a justifiable request for delay can render the right to defend with counsel an empty formality. Chandler v. FretagSearch
-
in every case, particularly in the reasons presented to the trial judge at the time the request is denied. Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
Torres v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ArlenSearch
-
Douglas v. AdelSearch
-
Negus v. DwyerSearch
-
Pugh v. WinterSearch
-
Brewer v. PlatzekSearch
-
the presence of the court may be punished by the nonsummary procedure applicable to other contempts of court. Goodman v. SalaSearch
-
Choate v. BarrettSearch
-
but wish to add that the contempt procedure employed by Judge Sarafite accorded Ungar more than his due under Sacher v. UnitedSearch
-
That was the result in Offutt v. UnitedSearch
-
standards. In re Murchison, 349 U. S. 133 . I start with what Chief Justice Taft wrote in Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
A financial interest in the outcome of a case, as in Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
Unlike Sacher v. UnitedSearch
-
in the trial guilty of contempt, the judge in the instant case, following the procedure recommended by Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Anderson v. DunnSearch
-
In re Oliver, supra, at 333 U. S. 275 of 333, quoting Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ungar v. SarafiteSearch
-
Bailey v. AndersonSearch
-
See Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. DavisSearch
-
See Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
Unlike Cooke v. UnitedSearch
-
and Offutt v. UnitedSearch
-
See Fisher v. PaceSearch
-
Sacher v. UnitedSearch
-
Avery v. AlabamaSearch
-
Nilva v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ArlenSearch
-
Negus v. DwyerSearch
-
Brewer v. PlatzekSearch
-
Goodman v. SalaSearch
-
Choate v. BarrettSearch
-
Offutt v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial