Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fpc Vs. Texaco, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 20, 1964

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 1 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. Vs. Wisconsin US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1954
  2. FPC v. Texaco
    Search
  3. Inc. - 377 U.S. 33 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Texaco
    Search
  4. Inc., 377 U.S. 33 (1964) Federal Power Commission v. Texaco
    Search
  5. neither meet those standards nor show why, in the public interest, the rule should be waived. United States v. Storer
    Search
  6. petition for certiorari which we granted because of an apparent conflict between that decision and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal
    Search
  7. as stated in Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U. S. 369 , 96 U. S. 377 . And see Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem
    Search
  8. That theme runs through the cases. See, e.g., Shaw v. Quincy
    Search
  9. sometimes is used as indicating a place of business ( Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Langdeau
    Search
  10. Gas Act. We think the Court of Appeals erred, that the present case is governed by the principle of United States v. Storer
    Search
  11. question that is important in effectuating the aim of the Act to protect the consumer interest. Federal Power Comm'n v. Hope
    Search
  12. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile
    Search
  13. may initiate sales at wholesale of natural gas in Page 377 U. S. 42 commerce. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public
    Search
  14. to initiate a hearing on their legality, with only a limited power to suspend new rates. See United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile
    Search
  15. that condemn all of them. There would be a vast proliferation of hearings, for, as a result of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin
    Search
  16. U. S. 672 , there are thousands of individual producers seeking applications. See Wisconsin v. Federal
    Search
  17. correction if regulatory objectives embraced by the statute are to be achieved. See American Trucking Associations v. United
    Search
  18. close of the review proceedings. Shell Oil Co., 18 F.P.C. 617, 19 F.P.C. 74, set aside sub nom. Shell Oil Co. v. Federal
    Search
  19. Power Comm'n, 263 F.2d 223, rev'd sub nom. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Shell
    Search
  20. Shell Oil Co. v. Federal
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Texaco
    Search
  22. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco
    Search
  23. United States v. Storer
    Search
  24. and Superior Oil Co. v. Federal
    Search
  25. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem
    Search
  26. Shaw v. Quincy
    Search
  27. Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Langdeau
    Search
  28. of United States v. Storer
    Search
  29. Federal Power Comm'n v. Hope
    Search
  30. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile
    Search
  31. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public
    Search
  32. See United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile
    Search
  33. of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin
    Search
  34. See Wisconsin v. Federal
    Search
  35. See American Trucking Associations v. United
    Search
  36. Shell Oil Co. v. Federal
    Search
  37. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Shell
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial