Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Massiah Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 18, 1964

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 5 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Johnson Vs. Zerbst US Supreme Court · May 23, 1938
  2. Mapp Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  3. Crooker Vs. California US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1958
  4. Payne Vs. Arkansas US Supreme Court · May 19, 1958
  5. Cicenia Vs. Lagay US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1958
  6. Massiah v. United
    Search
  7. States - 377 U.S. 201 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Massiah v. United
    Search
  8. States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964) Massiah v. United
    Search
  9. the Fourth Amendment, and, consequently, that all evidence which Murphy thereby obtained was, under the rule of Weeks v. United
    Search
  10. retained counsel. Because of the way we dispose of the case, we do not reach the Fourth Amendment issue. In Spano v. New
    Search
  11. People v. Waterman
    Search
  12. This view no more than reflects a constitutional principle established as long ago as Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  13. the Spano decision, the same basic constitutional principle has been broadly reaffirmed by this Court. Hamilton v. Alabama
    Search
  14. White v. Maryland
    Search
  15. U. S. 59 . See Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  16. but affirmed his convictions upon three substantive counts, one judge dissenting. 307 F.2d 62. See also People v. Davis
    Search
  17. People v. Rodriguez
    Search
  18. People v. Meyer
    Search
  19. People v. Swanson
    Search
  20. People v. Price
    Search
  21. People v. Wallace
    Search
  22. People v. Karmel
    Search
  23. People v. Robinson
    Search
  24. excluded not because of the quality of the proof, but to secure meaningful enforcement of the Fourth Amendment. Weeks v. United
    Search
  25. if obtained without counsel's consent or presence. The right to counsel has never meant as much before, Cicenia v. LaGay
    Search
  26. rejected the argument that admissions are to be deemed involuntary if made outside the presence of counsel. Cicenia v. LaGay
    Search
  27. Defendants who are out on bail have been known to continue their illicit operations. See Rogers v. United
    Search
  28. McNabb v. United
    Search
  29. forbidden access to others. Law enforcement may have the elements of a contest about it, but it is not a game. McGuire v. United
    Search
  30. must consider the absence of counsel as one of several factors by which voluntariness is to be judged. See House v. Mayo
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Massiah v. United
    Search
  32. of Weeks v. United
    Search
  33. In Spano v. New
    Search
  34. Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  35. Court. Hamilton v. Alabama
    Search
  36. See Gideon v. Wainwright
    Search
  37. People v. Davis
    Search
  38. of the Fourth Amendment. Weeks v. United
    Search
  39. See Rogers v. United
    Search
  40. McGuire v. United
    Search
  41. See House v. Mayo
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial