Citation network
Reynolds Vs. Sims
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 533 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 533 (1964) Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
standards for lower courts to determine the constitutionality of a state legislative apportionment scheme. Baker v. CarrSearch
-
the same relief as the original plaintiffs. On March 29, 1962, just three days after this Court had decided Baker v. CarrSearch
-
limited period of time, required an early announcement of its views. 205 F.Supp. 245. Relying on our decision in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
was to follow an approach suggested by MR. JUSTICE CLARK in his concurring opinion in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
right to vote, Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U. S. 651 , and to have their votes counted, United States v. MosleySearch
-
U.S. Page 377 U. S. 555 at 238 U. S. 386 . T he right to vote can neither be denied outright, Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 238 U. S. 347 , Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 268 , nor destroyed by alteration of ballots, see United States v. ClassicSearch
-
U. S. 315 , nor diluted by ballot box stuffing, Ex parte Siebold, 100 U. S. 371 , United States v. SaylorSearch
-
U.S. at 313 U. S. 315 . Racially based gerrymandering, Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
U. S. 339 , and the conducting of white primaries, Nixon v. HerndonSearch
-
U. S. 536 , Nixon v. CondonSearch
-
U. S. 73 , Smith v. AllwrightSearch
-
U. S. 649 , Terry v. AdamsSearch
-
Page 377 U. S. 556 In Baker v. CarrSearch
-
In Gray v. SandersSearch
-
unlike Baker v. CarrSearch
-
that of determining the basic standards and stating the applicable guidelines for implementing our decision in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
In Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
is that the rights allegedly impaired are individual and personal in nature. As stated by the Court in United States v. BathgateSearch
-
citizens which constitutes an impermissible impairment of their constitutionally protected right to vote. Like Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
of the right of citizens to vote must be carefully and meticulously scrutinized. Almost a century ago, in Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
U. S. 339 , 364 U. S. 342 . As we stated in Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
rights under the Fourteenth Amendment just as much as invidious discriminations based upon factors such as race, Brown v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 347 U. S. 483 , or economic status, Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 12 , Douglas v. CaliforniaSearch
-
our oath and our office require no less of us. As stated in Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
the admittedly existing malapportionment, and in ascertaining what sort of judicial relief, if any, should be afforded. v. SinceSearch
-
analogous to that used for apportioning seats in Congress. Much has been written since our decision in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
threatened to abort the birth of our Nation. In rejecting an asserted analogy to the federal electoral college in Gray v. SandersSearch
-
created by the State to assist in the carrying out of state governmental functions. As stated by the Court in Hunter v. CitySearch
-
As we stated in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
a State in adjusting to the requirements of the court's decree. As stated by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, concurring in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Together with No. 27, Vann et al. v. BaggettSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial