Citation network
Escobedo Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 478 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 478 (1964) Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
and no statement extracted by the police during the interrogation may be used against him at a trial. Crooker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 433 , and Cicenia v. LagaySearch
-
Compare Lynumn v. IllinoisSearch
-
Ill.2d 41, 45-46, 190 N.E.2d 825, 827. The court also held, on the authority of this Court's decisions in Crooker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
for the reasons stated below, that it was not and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of conviction. In Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 377 U. S. 204 , quoting DOUGLAS, J., concurring in Spano v. NewSearch
-
Spano v. NewSearch
-
Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
complicity in the murder plot was legally as damaging as an admission of firing of the fatal shots. Illinois v. EscobedoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
was essential to advise petitioner of his rights in this delicate situation. Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
were most critical to petitioner. Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, at 377 U. S. 204 . It was a stage surely as critical as was the arraignment in Hamilton v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 52 , and the preliminary hearing in White v. MarylandSearch
-
meaningful distinction can be drawn between interrogation of an accused before and after formal indictment. In People v. DonovanSearch
-
In Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
are surely needed. Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
White v. MarylandSearch
-
no statement elicited by the police during the interrogation may be used against him at a criminal trial. Crooker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
a well educated man who had studied criminal law while attending law school for a year. The Court's opinion in Cicenia v. LagaySearch
-
contention that petitioner had a constitutional right to confer with counsel is disposed of by Crooker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Compare Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
into evidence of a coerced confession be the subject of an independent determination here, see, e.g., Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
we cannot escape the responsibility of making our own examination of the record,' Spano v. NewSearch
-
See Broeder, Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
February 25, 1956, exposing the false confessions obtained during the Stalin purges of the 1930's. See also Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
privilege against self-incrimination and his right to counsel either at a pretrial stage or at the trial. See Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
The authority of Cicenia v. LagaySearch
-
U. S. 504 , and Crooker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 433 , was weakened by the subsequent decisions of this Court in Hamilton v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 52 , White v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 59 , and Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Illinois on the basis of Cicenia v. LagaySearch
-
criminal law enforcement. MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissenting. I think this case is directly controlled by Cicenia v. LagaySearch
-
U. S. 504 , and I would therefore affirm the judgment. Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
right of confrontation, and the right to trial by jury. Another is the guarantee of the assistance of counsel. Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE WHITE, with whom MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART join, dissenting. In Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
the new constitutional right announced will depend upon whether the accused has retained his own counsel, cf. Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
Crooker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and Cicenia v. LagaySearch
-
In Massiah v. UnitedSearch
-
Illinois v. EscobedoSearch
-
Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
Massiah v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial