Citation network
Barr Vs. City of Columbia
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1964
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Barr v. CitySearch
-
of Columbia - 378 U.S. 146 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Barr v. CitySearch
-
of Columbia, 378 U.S. 146 (1964) Barr v. CitySearch
-
The breach of peace convictions cannot stand, there having been no evidence to support them. Thompson v. CitySearch
-
peace reversed and remanded, and for criminal trespass reversed and remanded per curiam for reasons stated in Bouie v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 347 . Page 378 U. S. 147 MR. JUSTICE BLACK, delivered the opinion of the Court. Like Bouie v. CitySearch
-
peace statute as applied to their conduct was unconstitutionally vague for failure to give fair warning, cf. Lanzetta v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 451 , or there was no evidence to support convictions for violation of that statute, cf. Thompson v. CitySearch
-
We cannot accept the City's argument, since, in City of Columbia v. BouieSearch
-
requirements which are not strictly or regularly followed cannot deprive us of the right to review. See, e.g., NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Shuttlesworth v. CitySearch
-
Wright v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Page 378 U. S. 150 NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
we are reluctant to assume that the breach of peace statute covers petitioners' conduct here. Cf. e.g., Henry v. CitySearch
-
Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 1 . Since there was no evidence to support the breach of peace convictions, they should not stand. Thompson v. CitySearch
-
trespass convictions, those judgments are also reversed, and the case remanded for the reasons stated in Bouie v. CitySearch
-
p. 378 U. S. 347 . MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse for the reasons stated in his opinion in Bell v. MarylandSearch
-
judgments of the Court, also reverse for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG in Bell v. MarylandSearch
-
City of Charleston v. MitchellSearch
-
S.C. 376, 123 S.E.2d 512, rev'd on another point, p. 551. See also State v. EdwardsSearch
-
S.C. 339, 123 S.E.2d 247, rev'd on another point sub nom. Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
City of Greenville v. PetersonSearch
-
The City cites no decision of the Supreme Court of South Carolina which supports its position on this issue. State v. EdwardsSearch
-
S.C. 339, 123 S.E.2d 247, rev'd sub nom. Edwards v. SouthSearch
-
petitioners' contention that their breach of peace convictions were void for vagueness under the doctrine of Lanzetta v. NewSearch
-
WHITE join, dissenting from the reversal of the trespass convictions. We have stated in our opinions in Bouie v. CitySearch
-
of Columbia, post, p. 378 U. S. 363 , and Bell v. MarylandSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Barr v. CitySearch
-
Thompson v. CitySearch
-
Bouie v. CitySearch
-
of the Court. Like Bouie v. CitySearch
-
Lanzetta v. NewSearch
-
City of Columbia v. BouieSearch
-
NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Henry v. CitySearch
-
Bell v. MarylandSearch
-
State v. EdwardsSearch
-
of Lanzetta v. NewSearch
-
and Bell v. MarylandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial