Citation network
Bantam Books, Inc. Vs. Sullivan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 03, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 58 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
-
U.S. 58 (1963) Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
-
Page 372 U. S. 65 We held in Alberts v. CaliforniaSearch
-
decided with Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
Our insistence that regulations of obscenity scrupulously embody the most rigorous procedural safeguards, Smith v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the larger principle that the freedoms of expression must be ringed about with adequate bulwarks. See, e.g., Thornhill v. AlabamaSearch
-
Winters v. NewSearch
-
of the State within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ex parte Young, 209 U. S. 123 . Cf. Terry v. AdamsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cf. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity. See Near v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Lovell v. CitySearch
-
Schneider v. NewSearch
-
Kunz v. NewSearch
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
Kingsley Page 372 U. S. 71 Books, Inc. v. BrownSearch
-
adult readers are equally deprived of the opportunity to purchase the publications in the State. Cf. Butler v. MichiganSearch
-
Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSearch
-
federal law, and at the same time their injury has been a legal injury. See Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
a claim, plainly justiciable, of unlawful interference in advantageous business relations. American Mercury, Inc., v. ChaseSearch
-
Pocket Books, Inc. v. WalshSearch
-
standing is concerned, that the allegedly unlawful interference here is the product of state action. See Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
Columbia Broadcasting System v. UnitedSearch
-
guarantee of freedom of the press embraces the circulation of books, as well as their publication, Lovell v. CitySearch
-
it. Unless he is permitted to sue, infringements of freedom of the press may too often go unremedied. Cf. NAACP v. StateSearch
-
of chiefs of police or prosecutors, have been enjoined in a number of cases. See Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. BlancSearch
-
Bunis v. ConwaySearch
-
Sunshine Book Co. v. McCaffreySearch
-
Random House, Inc., v. DetroitSearch
-
HMH Publishing Co. v. GarrettSearch
-
New American Library of World Literature v. AllenSearch
-
Bantam Books, Inc. v. MelkoSearch
-
Dearborn Publishing Co. v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Epoch Producing Corp. v. DavisSearch
-
Roper v. WinnerSearch
-
American Mercury, Inc. v. ChaseSearch
-
Pocket Books, Inc. v. WalshSearch
-
Dell Publishing Co. v. BeggansSearch
-
N.J.Eq. 72, 158 A. 765 (Chancery 1932). See also Magtab Publishing Corp. v. HowardSearch
-
of informal censorship here constitutes state action is in no way inconsistent with Standard Computing Scale Co. v. FarrellSearch
-
Nothing in the Court's opinion in Times Film Corp. v. ChicagoSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, concurring. While I join the opinion of the Court, I adhere to the views I expressed in Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
But, after all this expostulation, the Court, being unable to strike down Rhode Island's statute, see Alberts v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial