Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Construction Laborers Vs. Curry

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 21, 1963

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

60 entries 3 linked 57 unlinked
Show
  1. Department of Banking Vs. Pink US Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1942
  2. Forgay Vs. Conrad US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1848
  3. Radio Station Wow, Inc. Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1945
  4. U.S. 542 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Construction Laborers v. Curry
    Search
  5. U.S. 542 (1963) Local No. 438, Construction & General Laborers' Union, AFL-CIO v. Curry
    Search
  6. that Page 371 U. S. 543 appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  7. Pp. 371 U. S. 550 -551. (d) Montgomery Building Trades Council v. Ledbetter
    Search
  8. lay within the exclusive powers of the Page 371 U. S. 547 National Labor Relations Board. Plumbers Union v. Door
    Search
  9. San Diego Council v. Garmon
    Search
  10. Hotel Employees Union v. Sax
    Search
  11. Weber v. Anheuser-Busch
    Search
  12. Garner v. Teamsters
    Search
  13. b). This precise contention has been previously considered and rejected by this Court. Local Union 429 v. Farnsworth
    Search
  14. court has erroneously decided a matter of federal law in a case admittedly within its jurisdiction (compare Gibbons v. Ogden
    Search
  15. it the question of whether federal or state law governs a case properly before the Georgia courts. Compare Local 174 v. Lucas
    Search
  16. The jurisdictional determination here is as final and reviewable as was the District Court's decision in Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  17. Id. at 337 U. S. 546 . And in Radio Station WOW v. Johnson
    Search
  18. by the judgment below, Page 371 U. S. 550 and is not subject to further review in the state courts. Lankford v. Milhollin
    Search
  19. Smoot v. Alexander
    Search
  20. Dixon v. Federal
    Search
  21. Blackwell v. Southland
    Search
  22. courts. There is another entirely adequate reason for sustaining our authority to review in this case. In Pope v. Atlantic
    Search
  23. Court looked to the whole record, as we are entitled to do in determining questions of finality, Department of Banking v. Pink
    Search
  24. Gospel Army v. Los
    Search
  25. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State
    Search
  26. the employee freely conceded he had no further defenses to offer in the state courts, relying upon Richfield Oil Corp. v. State
    Search
  27. and within the scope of the Pope and Richfield cases. Cf. Clark v. Williard
    Search
  28. Page 371 U. S. 552 There remains the matter of Montgomery Building & Construction Trades Council v. Ledbetter
    Search
  29. upon interlocutory injunctions are not final judgments. Ledbetter, of course, was decided before Garner v. Teamsters
    Search
  30. where the decision below did not have all of the traditional badges of finality. Cf. Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  31. Ga. at 514, 123 S.E.2d at 655, quoting from Powers v. Courson
    Search
  32. See also Meat Cutters Local 427 v. Fairlawn
    Search
  33. Radio Union v. Labor
    Search
  34. Labor Board v. Local
    Search
  35. and followed, older cases recognizing a judgment as final even though an accounting was still to take place. Forgay v. Conrad
    Search
  36. Carondelet Canal & Navigation Co. v. Louisiana
    Search
  37. E.g., San Diego Council v. Garmon
    Search
  38. today, none of this Court's decisions could be interpreted to suggest that a state court's determination as to state v. federal
    Search
  39. when further proceedings on the merits were still pending. Indeed, Montgomery Building & Construction Trades Council v. Ledbetter
    Search
  40. effect of mooting the underlying dispute, thereby aborting any review of the jurisdictional issue. Neither Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  41. Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U. S. 541 , nor Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. Johnson
    Search
  42. that the entire case must stand or fall on the federal claim now presented, the case is squarely governed by Pope v. Atlantic
    Search
  43. My views in this area are more fully set forth in the dissenting opinion I have filed in Mercantile National Bank v. Langdeau
    Search
  44. U.S. Supreme Court Construction Laborers v. Curry
    Search
  45. Construction & General Laborers' Union, AFL-CIO v. Curry
    Search
  46. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  47. Montgomery Building Trades Council v. Ledbetter
    Search
  48. National Labor Relations Board. Plumbers Union v. Door
    Search
  49. Radio Station WOW v. Johnson
    Search
  50. Lankford v. Milhollin
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial