Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Draper Vs. Washington

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 18, 1963

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 1 linked 42 unlinked
Show
  1. Gunning Vs. Cooley US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1930
  2. U.S. 487 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Draper v. Washington
    Search
  3. U.S. 487 (1963) Draper v. Washington
    Search
  4. This Court has dealt recently with the constitutional rights of indigents to free transcripts on appeal in Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  5. U. S. 12 , and Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  6. S. 216 , and remanded the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion. In response, in Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  7. incarcerated. Although they no longer wished the aid of counsel, the judge, in accordance with a statement in Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  8. argued that petitioners' contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction was, under Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  9. One of that court quashed the writ, holding that the trial court had properly applied the principles of Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  10. Coppedge v. United
    Search
  11. them the rights assured them by this Court's decisions in Griffin and Eskridge. The rules set out in Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  12. what the judge recalled and thereafter summarily found as to what went on at the trial. This Court, in Coppedge v. United
    Search
  13. are to be tested for frivolity, they will be tested on the same basis by the reviewing court. Compare Ellis v. United
    Search
  14. Coppedge v. United
    Search
  15. a satisfactory record. Consequently, with all due deference, I dissent. I The Court, as it should, Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  16. Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  17. Johnson v. United
    Search
  18. party appealing and certified by a bystander where the judge refuses or is unable so to certify. See, e.g., Cartwright v. Barnett
    Search
  19. McKee v. Elwell
    Search
  20. Miller v. United
    Search
  21. Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. Toponce
    Search
  22. U. S. 405 , 152 U. S. 408 . See generally Galloway v. United
    Search
  23. reporter's transcript to prove perjury, evidence which the trial court found they did not have, see United States v. Johnson
    Search
  24. Mesarosh v. United
    Search
  25. State v. Brooks
    Search
  26. placed nothing before Page 372 U. S. 507 the appellate court for review, see, e.g., Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Watson
    Search
  27. Erdmann v. Henderson
    Search
  28. Nordlund v. Pearson
    Search
  29. require a complete transcript in every case, contrary to the Court's own standards and contrary to the rules of Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  30. of the State of Washington in and for the County of Spokane No. 16603 STATE OF WASHINGTON, PLAINTIFF v. RAYMOND
    Search
  31. automobile, which the defendant Robert Draper was driving and in which the defendant Raymond Lorentzen was waiting. v. That
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Draper v. Washington
    Search
  33. Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  34. and Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  35. Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  36. of Woods v. Rhay
    Search
  37. Compare Ellis v. United
    Search
  38. Johnson v. United
    Search
  39. Cartwright v. Barnett
    Search
  40. Galloway v. United
    Search
  41. United States v. Johnson
    Search
  42. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Watson
    Search
  43. State of Washington, Plaintiff V. Raymond
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial