Citation network
Townsend Vs. Sain
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 18, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 293 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Townsend v. SainSearch
-
U.S. 293 (1963) Townsend v. SainSearch
-
of voluntariness, because it bears on the issue of credibility, may also be presented to the jury. See, e.g., People v. SchwartzSearch
-
People v. RoachSearch
-
death penalty to its verdict. The Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed the conviction, two justices dissenting. People v. TownsendSearch
-
The Page 372 U. S. 309 Court has usually so stated the test. See, e.g., Stroble v. CaliforniaSearch
-
And in Blackburn v. AlabamaSearch
-
anew -- is a recurring one. The Court last dealt at length with it in Brown v. AllenSearch
-
in the 1959 Term to consider the question, but ultimately disposed of the case on a more immediate ground. Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
U. S. 534 , 365 U. S. 540 . It has become apparent that the opinions in Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the federal courts on habeas corpus are reviewed at length in the Court's opinion in Fay Page 372 U. S. 311 v. NoiaSearch
-
determine the facts de novo in the largest terms, restated what apparently was the common law understanding. Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
Since Frank v. MangumSearch
-
U. S. 271 , 326 U. S. 274 . Brown v. AllenSearch
-
presupposes the opportunity to be heard, to argue and present evidence, must never be totally foreclosed. See Frank v. MangumSearch
-
standard -- which must be considered to supersede, to the extent of any inconsistencies, the opinions in Brown v. AllenSearch
-
tests of the opinions in Brown v. AllenSearch
-
fact applied correct standards of federal law to the facts, in the absence of evidence, such as was present in Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
supra, at 365 U. S. 546 . See Frank v. MangumSearch
-
that state factual determinations not fairly supported by the record cannot be conclusive of federal rights. Fiske v. KansasSearch
-
of the person are claimed to have been infringed, we carefully scrutinize the state court record. See, e.g., Blackburn v. AlabamaSearch
-
Moore v. MichiganSearch
-
district judge on habeas. If, for any reason not attributable to the inexcusable neglect of petitioner, see Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
developed at the state hearing, a federal hearing is compelled. The standard of inexcusable default set down in Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
piecemeal presentation of constitutional claims in the form of deliberate bypassing of state procedures. Compare Price v. JohnstonSearch
-
independently. The state conclusions of law may not be given binding weight on habeas. That was settled in Brown v. AllenSearch
-
a full and fair state court evidentiary hearing resulting in reliable findings. See United States ex rel. Jennings v. RaganSearch
-
must be made on the front line, by the district judges who are conscious of their paramount responsibility in this area. v. ApplicationSearch
-
medical experts' failure to testify fully cannot realistically be regarded as Townsend's inexcusable default. See Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
See Thomas v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 64 (per curiam) (vacating judgment on authority of Jennings v. RagenSearch
-
Tillery v. CavellSearch
-
Schlette v. PeopleSearch
-
Bolling v. SmythSearch
-
Chavez v. DicksonSearch
-
Gay v. GrahamSearch
-
Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
Alvarez v. MurphySearch
-
Tyler v. PepersackSearch
-
Cranor v. GonzalesSearch
-
De Vita v. McCorkleSearch
-
Of course, under Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Townsend v. SainSearch
-
People v. SchwartzSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial