Citation network
Dugan Vs. Rank
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 15, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 609 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Dugan v. RankSearch
-
U.S. 609 (1963) Dugan v. RankSearch
-
water at the dam, which is part of the Central Valley Reclamation Project. 50 Stat. 844, 850 (1937). See United States v. GerlachSearch
-
Page 372 U. S. 611 which would afford the landowners a supply of water simulating that of the past. Rank v. KrugSearch
-
the claimed water rights, and that the officials were therefore acting beyond their statutory authority. California v. RankSearch
-
August 26, 1937, 50 Stat. 844, 850. It is generally described in sufficient detail for our purposes in United States v. GerlachSearch
-
Live Stock Co., supra, and Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSearch
-
and it decided this issue presented no substantial constitutional question. Rank v. KrugSearch
-
of the latter year, the United States withdrew its consent with the approval of the Court of Appeals, United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Likewise, in United States v. GerlachSearch
-
others were entitled to compensation therefor. The question was specifically settled in Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSearch
-
of respondents' claimed rights. We believe that the Court of Appeals incorrectly applied the principle of Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
falls within either of the recognized exceptions to the above general rule, as reaffirmed only last Term. Malone v. BowdoinSearch
-
U. S. 643 . See Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Santa Fe Pac. R. Co. v. FallSearch
-
themselves or the manner in which they are exercised Page 372 U. S. 622 are constitutionally void. Malone v. BowdoinSearch
-
might do, injunctive relief was not proper. Despite this caveat, damages were clearly ascertainable ( see Collier v. MercedSearch
-
U. S. 625 and after the interference or partial taking. As the Supreme Court of California said in Collier v. MercedSearch
-
might be analogized to interference or partial taking of air space over land, such as in our recent case of Griggs v. AlleghenySearch
-
County, 369 U. S. 84 , 369 U. S. 89 -90 (1962). See United States v. CausbySearch
-
Portsmouth Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Peabody Page 372 U. S. 626 v. UnitedSearch
-
Together with No. 115, Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District et al. v. RankSearch
-
lasted more than 200 days, required 30,000 pages of record and produced hundreds of orders. Opinions below are State v. RankSearch
-
Rank v. UnitedSearch
-
Krug), 142 F.Supp. 1 (D.C.S.D.Cal.1956). Related cases involving intermediate orders of the District Court are Rank v. KrugSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
California v. UnitedSearch
-
City of Fresno v. EdmonstonSearch
-
The last two sections of the judgment are dealt with in cause No. 51, City of Fresno v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Dugan v. RankSearch
-
See United States v. GerlachSearch
-
Rank v. KrugSearch
-
California v. RankSearch
-
United States v. GerlachSearch
-
and Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSearch
-
of the Court of Appeals, United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSearch
-
of Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Term. Malone v. BowdoinSearch
-
See Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Malone v. BowdoinSearch
-
Collier v. MercedSearch
-
of Griggs v. AlleghenySearch
-
See United States v. CausbySearch
-
State v. RankSearch
-
Land v. DollarSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial