Citation network
Sanders Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 29, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 373 U.S. 1 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 373 U.S. 1 (1963) Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
This provision has caused uncertainty Page 373 U. S. 7 in the District Courts, see Bistram v. UnitedSearch
-
with the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the instant case, compare, e.g., Juelich v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
At common law, the denial by a court or judge of an application for habeas corpus was not res judicata. King v. SuddisSearch
-
Burdett v. AbbotSearch
-
Cox v. HakesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Accardi v. ShaughnessySearch
-
Heflin v. UnitedSearch
-
Powell v. SacksSearch
-
U. S. 391 , 372 U. S. 423 . It has been suggested, see Salinger v. LoiselSearch
-
though a second or successive application states a claim for relief. One such situation is that involved in Salinger v. LoiselSearch
-
on a prior motion and decided against the prisoner. Another such situation is that which was presented in Wong Doo v. UnitedSearch
-
application on a ground heard and denied on a prior application, and abuse of the writ -- was elaborated in Price v. JohnstonSearch
-
But the Court held that, regardless of the number of prior applications, the governing principle announced in Salinger v. LoiselSearch
-
Cf. Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
Note, 59 Yale L.J. 1183, 1188, n. 24 (1950). But the language cannot be taken literally. In United States v. HaymanSearch
-
U.S. at 342 U. S. 219 . (Emphasis supplied.) Accord, United States v. MorganSearch
-
Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
See Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
applies. See Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
the formulation of basic rules to guide the lower federal courts is both feasible and desirable. Compare Townsend v. SainSearch
-
factual allegations. So also, identical grounds may often be supported by different legal arguments, cf. Wilson v. CookSearch
-
Dewey v. DesSearch
-
Moines, 173 U. S. 193 , 173 U. S. 198 , or be couched in different language, United States v. JonesSearch
-
C.D.Kan.1961) (dictum), aff'd mem., 297 F.2d 835 (C.A.10th Cir. 1962), or vary in immaterial respects, Stilwell v. UnitedSearch
-
must have rested on an adjudication of the merits of the ground presented in the subsequent application. See Hobbs v. PepersackSearch
-
the basis that the files and records conclusively resolved these issues, an evidentiary hearing was held. See Motley v. UnitedSearch
-
Hallowell v. UnitedSearch
-
we canvassed the criteria of a full and fair evidentiary hearing recently in Townsend v. SainSearch
-
habeas corpus has traditionally been regarded as governed by equitable principles. United States ex rel. Smith v. BaldiSearch
-
application may be deemed an abuse by the prisoner of the writ or motion remedy. The Court's recent opinions in Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
supra, at 372 U. S. 438 -440, and Townsend v. SainSearch
-
power -- and, if the ends of justice demand, the duty -- to Page 373 U. S. 19 reach the merits. Cf. Townsend v. SainSearch
-
with no supporting factual allegations. The court had the power to deny the motion on this ground, see Wilkins v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d 416 (1958), although the better course might have been to direct petitioner to amend his motion, see Stephens v. UnitedSearch
-
make an intelligent and understanding Page 373 U. S. 20 waiver of his constitutional rights. See Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
Moore v. MichiganSearch
-
Taylor v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
Bistram v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial