Citation network
WisconsIn Vs. Fpc
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 20, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 294 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Wisconsin v. FPCSearch
-
U.S. 294 (1963) Wisconsin v. FederalSearch
-
the opinion of the Court. Almost nine years have passed since this Court's decision in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSearch
-
to file an increase under a contract which, in effect, authorized him to do so at any time. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. MemphisSearch
-
b) of the Act in order to preserve a point for judicial review. See, e.g., Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. FederalSearch
-
that has gone this far than in the case of a decision whether or not to initiate an inquiry. See Minneapolis Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
need be followed by the Commission in considering the justness and reasonableness of rates, Federal Power Comm'n v. NaturalSearch
-
Federal Power Comm'n v. HopeSearch
-
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
We held in Federal Power Commission v. NaturalSearch
-
it is true, do not provide as much protection as the elimination of unreasonable rates, see Federal Power Comm'n v. TennesseeSearch
-
Together with No. 73, California et al. v. FederalSearch
-
Power Commission et al., and No. 74, Long Island Lighting Co. et al. v. FederalSearch
-
We do not interpret the decision of the Court of Appeals in Detroit v. FederalSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S.App.D.C. at 379, 303 F.2d at 390. See also Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
See the discussion in the opinions of Mr. Justice Jackson in Federal Power Comm'n v. HopeSearch
-
Natural Gas Co., 320 U. S. 591 , 320 U. S. 628 -660, and in Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
s position that it had no jurisdiction over the production of gas, this Court decided Phillips Petroleum Corp. v. WisconsinSearch
-
high price sales without providing for any conditions. This action was reversed in Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
P.C. at 1009. I regret that the Court has chosen this occasion to stand on technicality, compare Federal Trade Comm'n v. HenrySearch
-
for CATCO gas after our remand in Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
next, many of the consumers entitled to refunds cannot be found, etc. See Federal Power Comm'n v. TennesseeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wisconsin v. FPCSearch
-
Wisconsin v. FederalSearch
-
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. MemphisSearch
-
Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. FederalSearch
-
See Minneapolis Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Federal Power Comm'n v. NaturalSearch
-
Federal Power Commission v. NaturalSearch
-
Federal Power Comm'n v. TennesseeSearch
-
Detroit v. FederalSearch
-
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Phillips Petroleum Corp. v. WisconsinSearch
-
Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Federal Trade Comm'n v. HenrySearch
-
See Federal Power Comm'n v. TennesseeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial