Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Boesch Vs. Udall

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 27, 1963

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Orchard Vs. Alexander US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1895
  2. Brown Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · Apr 08, 1899
  3. Hawley Vs. Diller US Supreme Court · May 28, 1900
  4. Riverside Oil Co. Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · May 18, 1903
  5. Billings Vs. Truesdell US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1944
  6. U.S. 472 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Boesch v. Udall
    Search
  7. U.S. 472 (1963) Boesch v. Udall
    Search
  8. U.S.App.D.C. 344, 303 F.2d 204, and that of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Pierson
    Search
  9. With respect to earlier statutes containing no express administrative cancellation authority, this Court, in Cameron v. United
    Search
  10. Wife v. Underhill
    Search
  11. Lee v. Johnson
    Search
  12. Knight v. United
    Search
  13. selection). The continuing vitality of this general administrative authority was recently confirmed by us in Best v. Humboldt
    Search
  14. only on the basis of post-issuance breach ( note 8 supra, and accompanying text). See, e.g., Leach v. Cornell
    Search
  15. McCarthy v. Son
    Search
  16. Murray v. McNabb
    Search
  17. Moon v. Woodrow
    Search
  18. Drake v. Simmons
    Search
  19. Reay v. Lackie
    Search
  20. Secretary's conduct, at least did not regard it as inconsistent with the Mineral Leasing Act. Cf. Ivanhoe Irrig. Dist. v. McCracken
    Search
  21. Fleming v. Mohawk
    Search
  22. Noble v. Union
    Search
  23. Wilbur v. United
    Search
  24. In Melish Consolidated Placer Oil Mining Co. v. Testerman
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Boesch v. Udall
    Search
  26. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Pierson
    Search
  27. Cameron v. United
    Search
  28. Harkness & Wife v. Underhill
    Search
  29. Best v. Humboldt
    Search
  30. Leach v. Cornell
    Search
  31. the Mineral Leasing Act. Cf. Ivanhoe Irrig. Dist. v. McCracken
    Search
  32. Noble v. Union
    Search
  33. Moore v. Robbins
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales