Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Norvell Vs. Illinois

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 27, 1963

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Welch Vs. Henry US Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1938
  2. Fiske Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
    Relied / Followed
  3. Terminiello Vs. Chicago US Supreme Court · May 16, 1949
    Relied / Followed
  4. U.S. 420 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Norvell v. Illinois
    Search
  5. U.S. 420 (1963) Norvell v. Illinois
    Search
  6. S. 420 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Syllabus In applying the doctrine of Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  7. and therefore did not obtain it, and he did not, moreover, pursue an appeal. In 1956, we decided Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  8. a person because of his indigency of any rights of appeal afforded all other convicted defendants. And see Draper v. Washington
    Search
  9. Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  10. U. S. 214 . Cf. Burns v. Ohio
    Search
  11. with the adequate appellate review of his 1941 conviction, which he failed to pursue at that time. Cf. Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  12. against petitioner. Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  13. And so we have the narrow question -- whether a State may avoid the obligation of Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  14. had a lawyer, could be found to have waived his rights on appeal. We only hold that a State, in applying Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  15. is no prerequisite of equal protection of the laws within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. See Douglas v. California
    Search
  16. supra. As we said in Tigner v. Texas
    Search
  17. of the court reporter, some practical accommodation must be made. We repeat what was said in Metropolis Theater Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  18. U. S. 380 , 274 U. S. 385 . And see Terminiello v. Chicago
    Search
  19. The record in Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  20. of, rather than against, the petitioner. The Illinois court concluded that the decision of this Court in Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  21. than other constitutional judgments. This, it seems to me, is the clear import of this Court's decision in Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Norvell v. Illinois
    Search
  23. of Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  24. Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  25. Draper v. Washington
    Search
  26. Cf. Burns v. Ohio
    Search
  27. Cf. Eskridge v. Washington
    Search
  28. of the Fourteenth Amendment. See Douglas v. California
    Search
  29. Tigner v. Texas
    Search
  30. Metropolis Theater Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  31. Smith v. Bennett
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial