Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Reed Vs. the Yaka

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 27, 1963

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 3 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Shea US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1894
  2. Voris Vs. Eikel US Supreme Court · Nov 09, 1953
  3. Guzman Vs. Pichirilo US Supreme Court · May 21, 1962
  4. Reed v. The
    Search
  5. Yaka - 373 U.S. 410 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Reed v. The
    Search
  6. Yaka, 373 U.S. 410 (1963) Reed v. The
    Search
  7. underlying personal liability to support the in rem action. 307 F.2d 203. Having previously reserved, in Guzman v. Pichirilo
    Search
  8. prevents recovery by petitioner for Pan-Atlantic's breach of its warranty of seaworthiness. In Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki
    Search
  9. could be had notwithstanding the availability of compensation. Ten years later, in Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic
    Search
  10. charter absolves the owner from liability on its warranty of seaworthiness is a question we also reserved in Guzman v. Pichirilo
    Search
  11. See Guzman v. Pichirilo
    Search
  12. Cf. Cannella v. Lykes
    Search
  13. Cannella v. United
    Search
  14. Crumady v. The
    Search
  15. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn
    Search
  16. Alaska S.S. Co. v. Petterson
    Search
  17. Rogers v. United
    Search
  18. Crumady v. The
    Search
  19. Weyerhaeuser S.S. Co. v. Nacirema
    Search
  20. Waterman S.S. Corp. v. Dugan
    Search
  21. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn
    Search
  22. This decision goes further than anything yet done by the Court in FELA and admiralty cases ( see, e.g., Rogers v. Missouri
    Search
  23. Pac. R. Co., 352 U. S. 500 , and its offspring, and Gutierrez v. Waterman
    Search
  24. design was nowhere more concisely or more accurately summarized than in the dissenting opinion in Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic
    Search
  25. longshoremen if the ship had been operated by an independent Page 373 U. S. 419 company, cf. Alaska S.S. Co. v. Petterson
    Search
  26. the ship can exist even without any underlying personal liability. But I fully agree with the court below ( cf. Guzman v. Pichirilo
    Search
  27. a procedural device to provide a convenient forum where none would otherwise be available. See Continental Grain Co. v. Barge
    Search
  28. on its merits. I agree with the court below, and with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, see Grillea v. United
    Search
  29. on board by the demisee's employees. An analogy may concededly be drawn to this Court's holding in Alaska S.S. Co. v. Petterson
    Search
  30. a stevedore, but I would not extend that one-sentence 6-3 per curiam decision beyond its precise facts. Cf. Gutierrez, v. Waterman
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Reed v. The
    Search
  32. In Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki
    Search
  33. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic
    Search
  34. Weyerhaeuser S.S. Co. v. Nacirema
    Search
  35. Rogers v. Missouri
    Search
  36. and Gutierrez v. Waterman
    Search
  37. See Continental Grain Co. v. Barge
    Search
  38. Grillea v. United
    Search
  39. Cf. Gutierrez, v. Waterman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial