Citation network
Mcneese Vs. Board of Educ.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
of Educ. - 373 U.S. 668 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
of Educ., 373 U.S. 668 (1963) McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
Rights Act may not be defeated though relief was not first sought under a state law which provided a remedy. Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
may not be defeated because relief was not first sought under state law which provided a remedy. We stated in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
That is the statute that was involved in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
temporarily from exercising its jurisdiction until a suit could be brought in the state court. See Railroad Comm'n v. PullmanSearch
-
Thompson v. MagnoliaSearch
-
since any federal question could be reviewed when the cases came here through the hierarchy of state courts. Burford v. SunSearch
-
controlling this litigation. The right alleged is as plainly federal in origin and nature as those vindicated in Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Amendment. It is immaterial whether respondents' conduct is legal or illegal as a matter of state law. Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Gayle v. BrowderSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Borders v. RippySearch
-
F.2d 268, 271. Cf., e.g., Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
Schnell v. DavisSearch
-
Turner v. MemphisSearch
-
United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. UnitedSearch
-
in the federal courts when the most it could produce is a state court action that would have no such effect. See Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
rights are subject to such tenuous protection, prior resort to a state proceeding is not necessary. See Hillsborough v. CromwellSearch
-
to adjudicate the claim on the basis of state law, viz., diversity of citizenship, as was true in Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
Id., p. 320 U. S. 237 . And we held in Kline v. BurkeSearch
-
Construction Co., 260 U. S. 226 , that, apart from contests over a res ( Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSearch
-
As well stated by Judge Murrah in Stapleton v. MitchellSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting. In Burford v. SunSearch
-
citing United States v. DernSearch
-
Citing Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSearch
-
cases ( see, e.g., Carson v. BoardSearch
-
Carson v. WarlickSearch
-
Covington v. EdwardsSearch
-
Holt v. RaleighSearch
-
Parham Page 373 U. S. 677 v. DoveSearch
-
Shepard v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 207 F.Supp. 341), and, more than once, this Court has refused to interfere ( see Carson v. WarlickSearch
-
does not, in my opinion, leave the administrative proceeding sanctionless ( compare United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 325 U. S. 196 ), or, as in Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
Finally, we should be slow to hold unavailing an administrative remedy afforded by a State which long before Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Cases such as Mannings v. BoardSearch
-
of Public Instruction, 277 F.2d 370, and Borders v. RippySearch
-
the school boards had taken no affirmative steps whatever to desegregate the schools), and Orleans Parish School Board v. BushSearch
-
F.2d 156, and Gibson v. BoardSearch
-
As early as 1901, the Supreme Court of Illinois, in People v. MayorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
See Railroad Comm'n v. PullmanSearch
-
Burford v. SunSearch
-
Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Lane v. WilsonSearch
-
See Lane v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial