Citation network
United States Vs. Muniz
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 17, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 150 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MunizSearch
-
U.S. 150 (1963) United States v. MunizSearch
-
sustained during confinement in a federal prison and resulting from the negligence of a government employee. Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
largely in reliance upon our decision in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
the burden on Congress of investigating and passing upon private bills seeking individual relief. See Dalehite v. UnitedSearch
-
Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
imply an exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act. For one thing, the Government urges that our decision in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
result. The Court held in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
of their employees. The Act extends to novel and unprecedented forms of liability as well. Indian Towing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Rayonier, Inc., v. UnitedSearch
-
compensation system, persuasive in Feres, does not of necessity preclude a suit for negligence. In United States v. BrownSearch
-
Page 374 U. S. 161 Third, private bills were never a problem in the military, Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
can be judged under the varying state laws of malpractice without violent dislocation of prison routine. Cf. Panella v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
liable to their prisoners. For example, several States have decided that a warden in charge of a penitentiary, Carder v. SteinerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Md. 271, 170 A.2d 220, or a sheriff in charge of a county jail, Bush v. BabbSearch
-
a house of correction has no duty of care toward his prisoners which would make him liable for his negligence. O'Hare v. JonesSearch
-
As we said in Rayonier, Inc., v. UnitedSearch
-
James v. UnitedSearch
-
Lack v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
Berman v. UnitedSearch
-
Golub v. UnitedSearch
-
Collins v. UnitedSearch
-
Trostle v. UnitedSearch
-
Van Zuch v. UnitedSearch
-
Shew v. UnitedSearch
-
Sigmon v. UnitedSearch
-
Ellison v. UnitedSearch
-
exception was made in the Act, and sovereign immunity was clearly waived as to such claims. See, e.g., United States v. BrownSearch
-
Johansen v. UnitedSearch
-
Sasse v. UnitedSearch
-
Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
and (3) Preferred Ins. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
a) still preserves government immunity. United States v. UreSearch
-
Coates v. UnitedSearch
-
McGillic v. UnitedSearch
-
Government immune at least when it was acting in a governmental, rather than a proprietary, capacity. E.g., Denning v. StateSearch
-
State v. SharpSearch
-
Monahan v. StateSearch
-
E.g., Paige v. StateSearch
-
White v. StateSearch
-
prisoners were permitted to recover against the State for negligently caused injuries incurred in prison. E.g., Moore v. StateSearch
-
construction given an Act of the Seventy-ninth Congress by the Eighty-fourth Congress is not determinative, Rainwater v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. LibertySearch
-
Ivey v. NorthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MunizSearch
-
See Dalehite v. UnitedSearch
-
Indian Towing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. BrownSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial