Citation network
Meyer Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 24, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Meyer v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 375 U.S. 233 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Meyer v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 375 U.S. 233 (1963) Meyer v. UnitedSearch
-
remainder Page 375 U. S. 236 of the proceeds. It followed the holding of the Second Circuit in United States v. BehrensSearch
-
had only to the extent that applicable state law permits such recovery by other creditors of the insured, Commissioner v. SternSearch
-
Internal Revenue Code of 1939 are measured by the policy contract as enforced by applicable state law, United States v. BessSearch
-
United States v. NewSearch
-
Sowell v. FederalSearch
-
the doctrine, despite state law, to the collection of federal tax Page 375 U. S. 237 liens. United States v. BehrensSearch
-
supra, and United States v. WintnerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
We note, however, that Behrens antedates our Stern and Bess opinions, as well as those in Aquilino v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 363 U. S. 509 (1960), and United States v. DurhamSearch
-
parties. Thus, state courts have refused to apply it where state-created homestead exemptions would be destroyed, Sims v. McFaddenSearch
-
or where the rights of insurance beneficiaries would be adversely affected, Bruns v. FirstSearch
-
or where the rights of third parties having equal equity would be prejudiced, Barbin v. MooreSearch
-
exemption was involved, Westgrove Savings Bank v. DunlavySearch
-
Iowa 1054, 181 N.W. 404, and Pugh v. WhitsittSearch
-
Robert Moody & Son v. CenturySearch
-
and Lockwood v. ExchangeSearch
-
and upon which the federal tax lien could attach. In addition, this Court, in United States v. BrosnanSearch
-
rules this Court fashioned in these cases. Indeed, it has not only permitted them to stand but, as was said in Holden v. StrattonSearch
-
This includes the exemption of life insurance proceeds. See Holden v. StrattonSearch
-
Page 375 U. S. 240 and its courts have refused to marshal assets where to do so will diminish those rights. Bruns v. FirstSearch
-
depends on whether state law recognizes similar liens asserted by private creditors -- was rejected in United States v. BessSearch
-
The basic principle in Bess was further amplified by Aquilino v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 363 U. S. 509 , and United States v. DurhamSearch
-
rights, but merely attaches consequences, federally defined, to rights created under state law. . . .' United States v. BessSearch
-
of the insured. This is what the New York policy is, as it seems to me. Neither is there anything in Bruns v. FirstSearch
-
Page 375 U. S. 244 Twice -- in this case and in United States v. BehrensSearch
-
United States v. DurhamSearch
-
Propper v. ClarkSearch
-
of the New York Insurance Law. See for example, Fried v. NewSearch
-
Rowen v. CommissionerSearch
-
lien A, superior to the federal lien, is cut out because, under local law, it is inferior to lien B. United States v. BuffaloSearch
-
United States v. CitySearch
-
Reserve Bank, 268 U. S. 449 , 268 U. S. 456 -457. See also Merrill v. NationalSearch
-
Scruggs v. MemphisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Meyer v. UnitedSearch
-
Commissioner v. SternSearch
-
and United States v. WintnerSearch
-
Aquilino v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States v. DurhamSearch
-
Sims v. McFaddenSearch
-
Bruns v. FirstSearch
-
Barbin v. MooreSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial