Citation network
Durfee Vs. Duke
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 02, 1963
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 106 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Durfee v. DukeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 106 (1963) Durfee v. DukeSearch
-
had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the litigation, and that title to the land was in the petitioners. Durfee v. KeifferSearch
-
Riley v. NewSearch
-
that is, to render the judgment. As Mr. Justice Bradley stated the doctrine in the leading case of Thompson v. WhitmanSearch
-
this principle was unambiguously established in Baldwin v. IowaSearch
-
no different when the claim is made that the original forum did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter. Davis v. DavisSearch
-
Treinies v. SunshineSearch
-
at 308 U. S. 78 . The reasons for such a rule are apparent. In the words of the Court's opinion in Stoll v. GottliebSearch
-
without exceptions. Doctrines of federal preemption or sovereign immunity may, in some contexts, be controlling. Kalb v. FeuersteinSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
the location of the boundary between them, or as to their respective sovereignty over the land in question. Fowler v. LindseySearch
-
New York v. PageSearch
-
Either State may at any time protect its interest by initiating independent judicial proceedings here. Cf. Missouri v. NebraskaSearch
-
The Act extended the rule of the Constitution to all courts, Federal as well as State. Mills v. DuryeeSearch
-
Davis v. DavisSearch
-
Throughout this litigation there has been no dispute as to the controlling effect of this factual issue. See Nebraska v. IowaSearch
-
an opportunity to contest subject matter jurisdiction, did not litigate the issue. Cf. Chicot County Drainage Dist. v. BaxterSearch
-
against all the world unless reversed on appeal or avoided for error or fraud in a direct proceeding. Brandeen v. LauSearch
-
Douglas County v. FeenanSearch
-
Gergen v. WesternSearch
-
Knowles v. GaslightSearch
-
Grover & Baker Sewing Machine Co. v. RadcliffeSearch
-
National Exchange Bank of Tiffin v. WileySearch
-
Old Wayne Mutual Life Assn. v. McDonoughSearch
-
Vallely v. NorthernSearch
-
Grubb v. PublicSearch
-
This decision was adhered to the following year in American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSearch
-
Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
Jackson v. IrvingSearch
-
the question of the applicability of the rule of jurisdictional finality to cases involving real property. See Stoll v. GottliebSearch
-
See Fall v. EastinSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Durfee v. DukeSearch
-
Durfee v. KeifferSearch
-
of Thompson v. WhitmanSearch
-
Baldwin v. IowaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial