Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Poller Vs. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 19, 1962

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 1 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. FountaIn Vs. Filson US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1949
  2. Poller v. Columbia
    Search
  3. Broadcasting System, Inc. - 368 U.S. 464 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Poller v. Columbia
    Search
  4. Broadcasting System, Inc., 368 U.S. 464 (1962) Poller v. Columbia
    Search
  5. CBS of its affiliation with WCAN because the public would still receive the same service from another source. Klor's v. Broadway-Hale
    Search
  6. Sartor v. Arkansas
    Search
  7. a market, or monopolize, then such conduct might well run afoul of the Sherman Law. See Times-Picayune Pub. Co. v. United
    Search
  8. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern
    Search
  9. the public will still receive the same service, it has been foreclosed by this Court's decision in Klor's, Inc., v. Broadway-Hale
    Search
  10. International Boxing Club v. United
    Search
  11. Compare Kennedy v. Silas
    Search
  12. Arenas v. United
    Search
  13. remained unresolved after the pleadings were closed and pretrial discovery Page 368 U. S. 478 had. Sartor v. Arkansas
    Search
  14. is open. E.g., Schneider v. McKesson
    Search
  15. the respondents' assertions of innocence is not enough to forestall the entry of summary judgment in their favor. Dyer v. MacDougall
    Search
  16. evidence. Courts do not exist to afford opportunities for such litigating gambles. See Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United
    Search
  17. Schneider v. McKesson
    Search
  18. Orvis v. Brickman
    Search
  19. Lavine v. Shapiro
    Search
  20. give rise to a cause of action under the antitrust laws. Federal Broadcasting System, Inc., Page 368 U. S. 484 v. American
    Search
  21. does not amount to an unreasonable restraint of trade in any meaningful sense of the term, cf. Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster
    Search
  22. Fargo Glass & Paint Co. v. Globe
    Search
  23. the respondents foresaw that petitioner would be willing to sell. The charges here are unlike those in United States v. Radio
    Search
  24. of the Sherman Act. United States v. Paramount
    Search
  25. United Page 368 U. S. 486 States v. Columbia
    Search
  26. authority to alleviate an applicant for a station license from the requirements of the antitrust laws, United States v. Radio
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Poller v. Columbia
    Search
  28. Klor's v. Broadway-Hale
    Search
  29. of the Sherman Law. See Times-Picayune Pub. Co. v. United
    Search
  30. Klor's, Inc., v. Broadway-Hale
    Search
  31. International Boxing Club v. United
    Search
  32. E.g., Schneider v. McKesson
    Search
  33. Dyer v. MacDougall
    Search
  34. See Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United
    Search
  35. Orvis v. Brickman
    Search
  36. Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster
    Search
  37. United States v. Radio
    Search
  38. States v. Columbia
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales