Citation network
Chewning Vs. Cunningham
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 19, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 443 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Chewning v. CunninghamSearch
-
U.S. 443 (1962) Chewning v. CunninghamSearch
-
of the United States, here relied upon, the converse has been adjudicated. In Gryger Page 368 U. S. 445 v. BurkeSearch
-
This holding was adhered to in Chandler v. FretagSearch
-
Cf. Fitzgerald v. SmythSearch
-
Va. 681, 689-690, 74 S.E.2d 810, 816. We put to one side Gryger v. BurkeSearch
-
convictions of the kind described in the statute is an issue tendered in Virginia. We said of a like issue in Reynolds v. CochranSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id., p. 365 U. S. 532 . In Reynolds v. CochranSearch
-
the prior convictions, used to bring the multiple-offender statute into play, may be inquired into. See, e.g., Wesley v. CommonwealthSearch
-
over the offenses and over the defendant and whether these offenses were punishable by a penitentiary sentence. Wesley v. CommonwealthSearch
-
See Royster v. SmithSearch
-
U. S. 447 the defendant was represented by counsel and whether it was a fair and impartial trial. Willoughby v. SmythSearch
-
In Virginia, a prior conviction that is on appeal may not be the proper basis for a recidivist charge. White v. CommonwealthSearch
-
rendered the same day or at the same term could both be used in a Virginia multiple-offender prosecution. Commonwealth v. WelshSearch
-
Va. 57. See Dye v. SkeenSearch
-
Double jeopardy and ex post facto application of a law are also questions which, as indicated in Reynolds v. CochranSearch
-
have merit. We only conclude that a trial on a charge of being a habitual criminal is such a serious one ( Chandler v. FretagSearch
-
For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, concurring in the result, see Nos. 56 and 57, Oyler v. BolesSearch
-
and Crabtree v. BolesSearch
-
He apparently did not appeal from the conviction. Fitzgerald v. SmythSearch
-
Hudson v. NorthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Chewning v. CunninghamSearch
-
In Reynolds v. CochranSearch
-
Wesley v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Willoughby v. SmythSearch
-
White v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Commonwealth v. WelshSearch
-
See Dye v. SkeenSearch
-
Fitzgerald v. SmythSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial