Citation network
Labor Board Vs. Walton Mfg. Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 09, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Labor Board v. WaltonSearch
-
Mfg. Co. - 369 U.S. 404 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Labor Board v. WaltonSearch
-
Mfg. Co., 369 U.S. 404 (1962) National Labor Relations Board v. WaltonSearch
-
Court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo. Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
U.S. 810) because there was a seeming noncompliance by that court with our admonitions in Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
has fashioned a special rule that was announced in National Labor Relations Page 369 U. S. 406 Board v. Tex-O-KanSearch
-
the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in decisions refusing enforcement of that particular type of order. See Labor Board v. Williamson-DickieSearch
-
Labor Board v. AlcoSearch
-
Labor Board v. IngramSearch
-
Labor Board v. AllureSearch
-
Frosty Morn Meats, Inc. v. LaborSearch
-
Board, 296 F.2d 617. The Court of Appeals in No. 77, Labor Board v. WaltonSearch
-
the union as to the reasons for the discharge of the employees in question, relied on the test stated in Labor Board v. Tex-O-KanSearch
-
Flour Mills Co., supra. In No. 94, Labor Board v. FloridaSearch
-
for one test of the substantiality of evidence in reinstatement cases and another test in other cases. Labor Board v. PittsburghSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Dyer v. MacDougallSearch
-
Together with No. 94, National Labor Relations Board v. FloridaSearch
-
inferences fairly to be drawn, in accordance with the scope of judicial review outlined in Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Board, 340 U. S. 474 , and its companion case, Labor Board v. PittsburghSearch
-
was improperly influenced in its determinations by what is deemed an erroneous legal rule as applied in Labor Board v. Tex-O-KanSearch
-
e), and elaborated in Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
relied on the test stated in Labor Board v. Tex-O-KanSearch
-
with the positive sworn evidence on the exact point. This was squarely ruled as to a jury in Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. ChamberlainSearch
-
the Court of Appeals for its view that testimony justifying discharge should not lightly be disregarded. Labor Board v. GoodyearSearch
-
Labor Board v. OklahomaSearch
-
Labor Board v. EdinburgSearch
-
Labor Board v. McGaheySearch
-
Labor Board v. DrennonSearch
-
Labor Board v. AtlantaSearch
-
Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 293 F.2d 300, 306. See also Frosty Morn Meats, Inc. v. LaborSearch
-
also been quoted to distinguish between cease and desist orders and those requiring payment of back pay. Labor Board v. Williamson-DickieSearch
-
an order requiring payment of a bonus found to have been withheld in order to discourage union activity. Labor Board v. CrosbySearch
-
This statement, torn from context in Judge Learned Hand's opinion in Dyer v. MacDougallSearch
-
of credibility is for the trier of fact, and is not to be upset on appeal. E.g., Tractor Training Service v. FederalSearch
-
Kitty Clover, Inc. v. LaborSearch
-
directed in favor of a party having the burden of proof if his case rests on the credibility of witnesses, e.g., Giles v. GilesSearch
-
And in Labor Board v. PittsburghSearch
-
witnesses. Yet the Board is not required to accept a trial examiner's credibility findings, see Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
for the advantage of the trier of fact does not require appellate impotence. Judge Hand's statement in Dyer v. MacDougallSearch
-
judicial review. Indeed, this Court has never before required complete deference to credibility findings. Labor Board v. PittsburghSearch
-
a great many findings not so unfounded as to indicate bias are nonetheless reversible error. In Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
a trier of fact to accept unimpeached testimony not contradicted by substantial evidence in the record. In Dickinson v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 346 U. S. 396 -397. In Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. MartinSearch
-
Labor Board v. PittsburghSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Labor Board v. WaltonSearch
-
National Labor Relations Board v. WaltonSearch
-
Universal Camera Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Board v. Tex-O-KanSearch
-
See Labor Board v. Williamson-DickieSearch
-
Labor Board v. Tex-O-KanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial