Citation network
Malone Vs. Bowdin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 14, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 643 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Malone v. BowdinSearch
-
U.S. 643 (1962) Malone v. BowdinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, and, in the absence of consent by the United States, the District Court was without jurisdiction. Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
as an official or employee of the United States, the District Court granted the motion to dismiss, relying upon Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
United States did not bar the maintenance of this suit, the Court of Appeals found principal support in United States v. LeeSearch
-
that the suit must fail as an effort to enjoin the United States. While not expressly overruling United States v. LeeSearch
-
The District Court's opinion is reported sub nom. Doe v. RoeSearch
-
Cunningham v. MaconSearch
-
See Stanley v. SchwalbySearch
-
Mine Safety Appliance Co. v. ForrestalSearch
-
compensation for the taking of their land by the United States. That tribunal is the Court of Claims. United States v. CausbySearch
-
Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
no such claim was ever suggested at any state of the proceedings. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. United States v. LeeSearch
-
Id. at 106 U. S. 218 . United States v. LeeSearch
-
was a five-to-four decision. But, as late as 1947, seven members of the Court agreed to the statement in Land v. DollarSearch
-
general law is in issue, and the defendants claim as officers or agents of the sovereign, the rule of United States v. LeeSearch
-
Two years later, in Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Foreign Corp., 337 U. S. 682 , the case of United States v. LeeSearch
-
Id. at 337 U. S. 705 . The holding in United States v. LeeSearch
-
See Sloan Shipyards v. UnitedSearch
-
change the traditional rules of liability for the tort of the agent by providing a fair substitute. Crozier v. FriedSearch
-
Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
it has been explicitly negatived in at least two cases. See Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Corp., supra, 337 U. S. 722 -723 (dissenting opinion). What Mr. Justice Miller said in United States v. LeeSearch
-
more and more out of date as the powers of the Government and its vast bureaucracy have increased. Keifer & Keifer v. ReconstructionSearch
-
Sloan Shipyards v. UnitedSearch
-
a recurring consideration in suits determining when and where a citizen can sue a governmental official. See Williams v. FanningSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Malone v. BowdinSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
Doe v. RoeSearch
-
Mine Safety Appliance Co. v. ForrestalSearch
-
the Court of Claims. United States v. CausbySearch
-
of United States v. LeeSearch
-
Crozier v. FriedSearch
-
See Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Keifer & Keifer v. ReconstructionSearch
-
See Williams v. FanningSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial