Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Vaughan Vs. Atkinson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 14, 1962

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

65 entries 65 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 527 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Vaughan v. Atkinson
    Search
  2. U.S. 527 (1962) Vaughan v. Atkinson
    Search
  3. is not allowed that item in computing the damages payable by the promisor. And the Court of Appeals, following Wilson v. United
    Search
  4. States, 229 F.2d 277, and Perez v. Suwanee
    Search
  5. admiralty courts are, indeed, authorized to grant equitable relief. See Swift & Co. v. Compania
    Search
  6. in equity actions, as where Negroes were required to bring suit against a labor union to prevent discrimination. Rolax v. Atlantic
    Search
  7. Coast Line R. Co., 186 F.2d 473, 481. As we stated in Sprague v. Ticonic
    Search
  8. Cortes v. Baltimore
    Search
  9. until he reaches maximum medical recovery. The policy underlying the duty was summarized in Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  10. reference must be made in defining it, are those enumerated in the classic passage by Mr. Justice Story in Harden v. Gordon
    Search
  11. Id. at 303 U. S. 529 . We noted in Aguilar v. Standard
    Search
  12. at 318 U. S. 735 . When there are ambiguities or doubts, they are resolved in favor of the seaman. Warren v. United
    Search
  13. Maintenance and cure differs from rights normally classified as contractual. As Mr. Justice Cardozo said in Cortes v. Baltimore
    Search
  14. In Johnson v. United
    Search
  15. has obtained and with admiralty's tender regard for seamen. We think the view of the Third Circuit ( see Yates v. Dann
    Search
  16. F.2d 64, 67) is preferable to that of Page 369 U. S. 534 the Second Circuit as expressed in Wilson v. United
    Search
  17. States and Perez v. Suwanee
    Search
  18. Harden v. Gordon
    Search
  19. first recognized in our law in Harden v. Gordon
    Search
  20. Fed.Cas. 480, No. 6,047, and Reed v. Canfield
    Search
  21. seaman put ashore, perhaps in a foreign port, without means of support, or hope of obtaining medical care. See Harden v. Gordon
    Search
  22. national interest in maintaining the morale and physical effectiveness of the merchant marine. Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  23. Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  24. Farrell v. United
    Search
  25. without expense in a marine hospital is not entitled to maintenance and cure for that period. Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor
    Search
  26. to a seaman who convalesces at the home of his parents without incurring expense or liability for his support. Johnson v. United
    Search
  27. simple, uncluttered by fine distinctions which breed litigation, with its attendant delays and expenses. See Farrell v. United
    Search
  28. in the amount of the counsel fees incurred in bringing his action for maintenance and cure. The Court held in Cortes v. Baltimore
    Search
  29. be measured by the amount of counsel fees, indirect compensation for such expenditures might thus be made. See Day v. Woodworth
    Search
  30. See Stankiewicz v. United
    Search
  31. Williams v. United
    Search
  32. Dodd v. The
    Search
  33. Nunes v. Farrell
    Search
  34. Ballard v. Alcoa
    Search
  35. payments for cure if marine hospital service is available, and a seaman seeks hospitalization elsewhere. United States v. Loyola
    Search
  36. United States v. Johnson
    Search
  37. Marshall v. International
    Search
  38. Zackey v. American
    Search
  39. Benton v. United
    Search
  40. Towing Co., 120 F.Supp. 638. See Kossick v. United
    Search
  41. at a marine hospital, expenses incurred for hospitalization elsewhere may be chargeable to the shipowner. Williams v. United
    Search
  42. been allowed as an offset against maintenance payments in many reported cases, usually without discussion. Rodgers v. United
    Search
  43. Inter Ocean S.S. Co. v. Behrendsen
    Search
  44. Loverich v. Warner
    Search
  45. Colon v. Trinidad
    Search
  46. Scott v. Lykes
    Search
  47. Steinberg v. American
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court Vaughan v. Atkinson
    Search
  49. Wilson v. United
    Search
  50. and Perez v. Suwanee
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial