Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

In Re Green

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 21, 1962

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 3 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. San Diego Building Trades Council Vs. Garmon US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1957
  2. Hovey Vs. Elliott US Supreme Court · May 24, 1897
  3. Howat Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1922
  4. in a collective bargaining agreement which was left by Congress either to federal courts ( Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln
    Search
  5. Mills, 353 U. S. 448 ) or to state courts. Teamsters Local v. Lucas
    Search
  6. id. at 333 U. S. 275 ) or the other types of contempt considered in Brown v. United
    Search
  7. the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board under the principles of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  8. U. S. 236 , and Amalgamated Association v. Wisconsin
    Search
  9. in citing a person for contempt for violating the injunction without such a hearing. For, as Amalgamated Association v. Wisconsin
    Search
  10. One of the companion cases in Amalgamated Association v. Wisconsin
    Search
  11. Employment Relations Board, supra, was No. 438, United Gas Workers v. Wisconsin
    Search
  12. U. S. 399 . The opinion was written by Chief Justice Vinson, who also wrote the opinion in United States v. United
    Search
  13. that this contempt conviction must be set aside, but not for the reasons given by the Court. In United States v. United
    Search
  14. even if it is determined on appeal that such jurisdiction was lacking. This holding was not new, United States v. Shipp
    Search
  15. U. S. 181 , and it has not been departed from since. It is the law of Ohio, Ohio Contractors Ass'n v. Local
    Search
  16. of state court jurisdiction to redress violation of such an agreement has recently been upheld in Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney
    Search
  17. in this case or that the picketing did not constitute a breach of such a contract. Local 174, Teamsters Union v. Lucas
    Search
  18. U. S. 95 , 369 U. S. 101 , makes clear that the rule stated in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  19. the fact that Mine Workers involved a federal restraining order, whereas, in Amalgamated Assn. of Bus Employees v. Wisconsin
    Search
  20. ancillary to a dispute over which the court has admitted jurisdiction scarcely serves to explain either United States v. Shipp
    Search
  21. assumed that jurisdiction of the entire controversy depended on whether the Constitution had been violated, or Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  22. of law requires obedience to it until a debatable issue of jurisdiction can be authoritatively decided. United States v. United
    Search
  23. Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln
    Search
  24. Teamsters Local v. Lucas
    Search
  25. Brown v. United
    Search
  26. of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  27. and Amalgamated Association v. Wisconsin
    Search
  28. Amalgamated Association v. Wisconsin
    Search
  29. United Gas Workers v. Wisconsin
    Search
  30. United States v. United
    Search
  31. the Court. In United States v. United
    Search
  32. of Ohio, Ohio Contractors Ass'n v. Local
    Search
  33. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney
    Search
  34. Teamsters Union v. Lucas
    Search
  35. Amalgamated Assn. of Bus Employees v. Wisconsin
    Search
  36. United States v. Shipp
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial