Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Beard Vs. Stahr

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 28, 1962

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 3 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Wieman Vs. Updegraff US Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1952
  2. Greene Vs. Mcelroy US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1959
  3. Cafeteria Workers Vs. Mcelroy US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  4. U.S. 41 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Beard v. Stahr
    Search
  5. U.S. 41 (1962) Beard v. Stahr
    Search
  6. satisfied that adequate procedures for seeking redress will be open to him. Compare Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch
    Search
  7. penalty. In comparable situations, the Government has been required to carry the burden of proof. Kwong Hai Chew v. Rogers
    Search
  8. Wood v. Hoy
    Search
  9. charges. This right, like the right to be heard, is basic to our society. Cf. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath
    Search
  10. Beilan v. Board
    Search
  11. and cross-examination are, as I understand the law, vital when one's employment rights are involved ( see Greene v. McElroy
    Search
  12. U. S. 474 , 360 U. S. 496 ) -- the factor that distinguishes Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy
    Search
  13. a military base. Perhaps the missing accuser -- whose activities were described in uncomplimentary terms in Rittenour v. District
    Search
  14. reliability. That question is very close Page 370 U. S. 44 to the one involved in No. 1123, Misc., Williams v. Zuckert
    Search
  15. standard which prescribes the basis on which discharges will be issued, the federal courts can intervene. See Harmon v. Brucker
    Search
  16. Law and Precedents (2d ed. 1896) 1104. If declaratory relief will be accorded, as it certainly could be ( Bland v. Connally
    Search
  17. Which, of course, is a mistaken premise. See Wiener v. United
    Search
  18. Blake v. United
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Beard v. Stahr
    Search
  20. Compare Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch
    Search
  21. Kwong Hai Chew v. Rogers
    Search
  22. Cf. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath
    Search
  23. Rittenour v. District
    Search
  24. Misc., Williams v. Zuckert
    Search
  25. See Harmon v. Brucker
    Search
  26. Bland v. Connally
    Search
  27. See Wiener v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial