Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lanza Vs. New York

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 04, 1962

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

60 entries 7 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. Wolf Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1949
  2. Whitfield Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Mar 02, 1936
  3. United States Vs. Jeffers US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1951
  4. Murdock Vs. Memphis US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1873
  5. Atchley Vs. California US Supreme Court · May 01, 1961
  6. Fox Film Corp. Vs. Muller US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1935
  7. Leyra Vs. Denno US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1954
  8. Lanza v. New
    Search
  9. York - 370 U.S. 139 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Lanza v. New
    Search
  10. York, 370 U.S. 139 (1962) Lanza v. New
    Search
  11. the Fourteenth Amendment gives to the people like protection against the conduct of the officials of any State. Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  12. Elkins v. United
    Search
  13. the wall of a house, violated the Page 370 U. S. 143 Fourth Amendment rights of the occupants. Silverman v. United
    Search
  14. beyond any decision which this Court has yet rendered. The case before us bears no resemblance to such cases as Leyra v. Denno
    Search
  15. trial a confession which had been elicited by trickery from the defendant while he was in jail. See also Spano v. New
    Search
  16. into a state criminal trial of evidence which is claimed to have been unconstitutionally seized, as in Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  17. U. S. 643 . See Rochin v. California
    Search
  18. Cf. Nardone v. United
    Search
  19. Costello v. United
    Search
  20. assuming, arguendo, that such an attenuated connection would help the petitioner's case. See Costello v. United
    Search
  21. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United
    Search
  22. Zap v. United
    Search
  23. Irvine v. California
    Search
  24. Nueslein v. District
    Search
  25. McGinnis v. United
    Search
  26. Gouled v. United
    Search
  27. Amos v. United
    Search
  28. Davis v. United
    Search
  29. Lustig v. United
    Search
  30. Jones v. United
    Search
  31. Gambino v. United
    Search
  32. Carroll v. United
    Search
  33. Brinegar v. United
    Search
  34. Henry v. United
    Search
  35. Rios v. United
    Search
  36. Cf. Lanza v. N.Y
    Search
  37. Coplon v. United
    Search
  38. See Jones v. United
    Search
  39. to intimate views on the other, more serious problems of constitutional dimension presented by the record, Herb v. Pitcairn
    Search
  40. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers
    Search
  41. Wall. 590, and would warrant dismissing the writ as improvidently granted, Benz v. New
    Search
  42. is unconvincing in determining whether its judgment was intended to rest on an independent state ground. See Benz v. New
    Search
  43. People v. Lanza
    Search
  44. Minnesota v. National
    Search
  45. least arguable that the proper disposition is to dismiss the case because certiorari was improvidently granted. Benz v. New
    Search
  46. See People v. Faden
    Search
  47. People v. Cummins
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court Lanza v. New
    Search
  49. State. Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  50. Silverman v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial