Citation network
Gallegos Vs. Colorado
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 04, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 49 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Gallegos v. ColoradoSearch
-
U.S. 49 (1962) Gallegos v. ColoradoSearch
-
U. S. 51 since such procedures are conducive to the use of physical and psychological pressures. Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
of confessions in that manner is a compound of two influences. First is the procedural requirement stated in Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
We emphasized this point in Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
Second is the element of compulsion which is condemned by the Fifth Amendment. Chief Justice Hughes in Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
And see Brennan, The Bill of Rights and the States, 36 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 761. We reiterated that view in Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
supra, where we held that the principle in Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
of these principles involves close scrutiny of the facts of individual cases. The length of the questioning ( Spano v. NewSearch
-
York, 360 U. S. 315 ), the use of fear to break a suspect ( Malinski v. NewSearch
-
York, 324 U. S. 401 ), the youth of the accused ( Haley v. OhioSearch
-
on which Page 370 U. S. 53 cases of this kind turn. The youth of the suspect was the crucial factor in Haley v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The fact that petitioner was only 14 years old puts this case on the same footing as Haley v. OhioSearch
-
all these combine to make us conclude that the formal confession on which this conviction may have rested ( see Payne v. ArkansasSearch
-
convicted of murder, and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life. But, as Mr. Justice Paterson said in Penhallow v. Donane'sSearch
-
the manner required in juvenile delinquency cases, or that Gallegos' case is in anywise on the same footing with Haley v. OhioSearch
-
singular circumstance pointed out by the Court has never been thought to render a confession inadmissible. See Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
as in Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
and was finally subjected to around-the-clock interrogation by a relay of from 4 to 10 persons. Nor does Leyra v. DennoSearch
-
ones. Likewise, the reference of the Court to Chief Justice Page 370 U. S. 63 Hughes' statement in Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
leather strap with buckles until their backs were cut to pieces, and they confessed. Nor does the holding in Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
under continuous cross-examination for 36 hours without rest or sleep. Nor can it, in my view, be said that Spano v. NewSearch
-
was a fledgling police officer as bait to break down the accused, led us to invalidate the confession. And in Malinski v. NewSearch
-
he confessed from apparent fear of his jailors. Finally, I see no similarity in Haley v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gallegos v. ColoradoSearch
-
Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
Spano v. NewSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
Haley v. OhioSearch
-
Payne v. ArkansasSearch
-
Penhallow v. Donane'sSearch
-
See Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial