Citation network
Atkinson Vs. Sinclair Refining Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Atkinson v. SinclairSearch
-
Refining Co. - 370 U.S. 238 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Atkinson v. SinclairSearch
-
Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238 (1962) Atkinson v. SinclairSearch
-
asked for an injunction, but that matter need not concern us here, since it is disposed of in Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSearch
-
and is to be governed by federal law. Local 174 v. LucasSearch
-
Textile Workers Union of America v. LincolnSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. WarriorSearch
-
Gulf Nav. Co., 363 U. S. 574 , 363 U. S. 582 . See also United Steelworkers of America v. AmericanSearch
-
of the collective bargaining contract in either a federal or state court is governed by federal law ( Local 174 v. LucasSearch
-
condition of employment the violation of which by employees justifies discipline or discharge ( Mastro Plastics Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Labor Board v. RockawaySearch
-
Labor Board v. SandsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Labor Board v. DraperSearch
-
United Biscuit Co. of America v. LaborSearch
-
clear that this third clause was a deeply felt congressional reaction against the Danbury Hatters case ( Loewe v. LawlorSearch
-
U. S. 522 ), and an expression of legislative determination that the aftermath ( Loewe v. SavingsSearch
-
Lewis v. BenedictSearch
-
in the more general sense of the term. See Hoover Motor Express Co. v. TeamstersSearch
-
the doctrine of the Hoover case or the Sixth Circuit cases following it ( e.g., Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
United Auto Aircraft v. BentonSearch
-
Harbor Malleable Indus., 242 F.2d 536). See also cases collected in Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. LocalSearch
-
Lodge No. 1717, 299 F.2d 882, 883-884 n. 5, 6 (C.A.3d Cir.). In Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. LocalSearch
-
Arbitrators generally have no obligation to give their reasons for an award. United Steelworkers of America v. EnterpriseSearch
-
Bernhardt v. PolygraphicSearch
-
The union also argues that the preemptive doctrine of cases such as San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. GarmonSearch
-
suit, that doctrine is inapplicable. Local 174 v. LucasSearch
-
from arbitrating the damage claim because it was over breach of the no-strike clause ( see Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. LocalSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Packinghouse Workers, 177 F.Supp. 511 (D.Colo.). Contra, Square D Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Elec., Radio & Machine Workers, 123 F.Supp. 776, 779-781 (E.D.Mich.). See also Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
whether there is a claim upon which relief can be granted is a separate question. See Bell v. HoodSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Atkinson v. SinclairSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. AmericanSearch
-
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. LaborSearch
-
Loewe v. SavingsSearch
-
See Hoover Motor Express Co. v. TeamstersSearch
-
Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. LocalSearch
-
(C.A.3d Cir.). In Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. LocalSearch
-
United Steelworkers of America v. EnterpriseSearch
-
San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. GarmonSearch
-
Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. LocalSearch
-
(D.Colo.). Contra, Square D Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
See Bell v. HoodSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial