Citation network
Sinclair Refining Co. Vs. Atkinson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 18, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 195 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSearch
-
U.S. 195 (1962) Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSearch
-
of a collective bargaining agreement. Pp. 370 U. S. 203 -210. (c) Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ChicagoSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
United Steelworkers v. AmericanSearch
-
United Steelworkers v. WarriorSearch
-
Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U. S. 574 , and United Steelworkers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ChicagoSearch
-
as the exclusive method for settling grievances under the Taft-Hartley Act. Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
this Court that the decision in Lincoln Mills, as implemented by the subsequent decisions in United Steelworkers v. AmericanSearch
-
and United Steelworkers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
in this case. Counts 1 and 2, upon which Sinclair prevailed below, are also before the Court in No. 430. See Atkinson v. SinclairSearch
-
Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 795 v. YellowSearch
-
have also considered this question, and both have taken the same position as that taken below. See W. L. Mead, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Alcoa S.S. Co. v. McMahonSearch
-
A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. Seafarers'Search
-
discussed on several occasions. See Frankfurter and Greene, The Labor Injunction. And see, e.g., United States v. HutchesonSearch
-
Milk Wagon Drivers' Union v. LakeSearch
-
This fact was expressly recognized by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. Seafarers'Search
-
International Union, 250 F.2d 326, 331-332. See also W. L. Mead, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
Act and the Taft-Hartley Act. Id. at 353 U. S. 31 -32, note 2. See also Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. ChicagoSearch
-
Id. at 353 U. S. 458 . See also Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. ChicagoSearch
-
Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
an important objective of some other statute in the pattern of labor laws. See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ChicagoSearch
-
Graham v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
Virginian R. Co. v. SystemSearch
-
International Ass'n of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
of collective agreements. In any event, I should have thought that the question was settled by Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
that actions based on collective agreements remain cognizable in state as well as federal courts, Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySearch
-
and that state courts must apply federal law in such actions, Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
will have had the strange consequence of taking away a contract remedy available before its enactment. v. TheSearch
-
United Steelworkers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
In Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
-
And in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ChicagoSearch
-
McCarroll v. LosSearch
-
See Atkinson v. SinclairSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSearch
-
the Taft-Hartley Act. Textile Workers Union v. LincolnSearch
-
See W. L. Mead, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
W. L. Mead, Inc. v. TeamstersSearch
-
Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. ChicagoSearch
-
See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ChicagoSearch
-
Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySearch
-
Teamsters Local v. LucasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial