Citation network
Wetzel Vs. Ohio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 05, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 62 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Wetzel v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 62 (1962) Wetzel v. OhioSearch
-
Court to dismiss his case and leave the disposition of his fine to the lower federal courts. See American Tobacco Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Melrose Distillers Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 359 U. S. 271 , 359 U. S. 272 . See Daniel v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 268 F.2d 849. But such is not the case in Ohio. There, the appeal will be dismissed as moot ( Makley v. StateSearch
-
State v. SholitonSearch
-
Ohio, however, that costs can be collected from a deceased convicted criminal's estate. State for Use of Clark County v. PageSearch
-
Under the present sentence, costs seem to be a penalty which is part of the sentence. See Hayes v. PontiusSearch
-
Elastic Fabrics Co. v. SmithSearch
-
U. S. 110 . The genesis of these cases was Canter v. AmericanSearch
-
Id. at 28 U. S. 319 . As stated by Chief Justice Taft, writing for the Court in Newton v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
if the conviction was invalid. In Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
the decedent's or his family's interest in his good name satisfies the case or controversy requirement. Cf. St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
STEWART join, dissents, believing that the appeal abated upon the death of the appellant, Edward J. Wetzel. Menken v. AtlantaSearch
-
times that the existence of a judgment taxing costs in such cases cannot alone prevent dismissal here. Heitmuller v. StokesSearch
-
Wingert v. FirstSearch
-
Paper-Bag Machine Co. v. NixonSearch
-
Glendale Elastic Fabrics Co. v. SmithSearch
-
Although such judgments may confer appellate jurisdiction to inquire into the lower court's power to tax costs, Newton v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Citizens' Bank of Louisiana v. CannonSearch
-
Intertype Corp. v. Clark-CongressSearch
-
such a judgment has been held not to confer jurisdiction to inquire into the merits of the original controversy, Smith v. IndianaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wetzel v. OhioSearch
-
See American Tobacco Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Daniel v. UnitedSearch
-
Makley v. StateSearch
-
Use of Clark County v. PageSearch
-
See Hayes v. PontiusSearch
-
Canter v. AmericanSearch
-
Newton v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
In Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
Edward J. Wetzel. Menken v. AtlantaSearch
-
Intertype Corp. v. Clark-CongressSearch
-
Smith v. IndianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial