Citation network
Fpc Vs. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 23, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FPC v. TranscontinentalSearch
-
Gas Pipe Line Corp. - 365 U.S. 1 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. TranscontinentalSearch
-
Gas Pipe Line Corp., 365 U.S. 1 (1961) Federal Power Commission v. TranscontinentalSearch
-
factors. For example, in United States v. DetroitSearch
-
the Commission has been entrusted with a wide range of discretionary authority. Interstate Commerce Commission v. ParkerSearch
-
See Interstate Commerce Commission v. RailwaySearch
-
Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
over certain aspects of this field, leaving the residue for state regulation. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
See Federal Power Commission v. HopeSearch
-
Natural Gas Co., 320 U. S. 591 , 320 U. S. 617 , note 30, and Federal Power Commission v. EastSearch
-
Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Service Commission, 332 U. S. 507 , 332 U. S. 520 . See Public Utilities Commission of Ohio v. UnitedSearch
-
did not desire that an important aspect of this field be left unregulated. See Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
will be created. Compare Guss v. UtahSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States have no control over the use to which gas is put in another State. See Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. CalvertSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
Oklahoma v. KansasSearch
-
Consuming States may control the end use of gas, Panhandle Eastern Page 365 U. S. 21 Pipe Line Co. v. MichiganSearch
-
balancing process, in the course of which all the factors are weighed prior to final determination. United States v. DetroitSearch
-
prices. We have recently answered this question in favor of the Commission's jurisdiction. See Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
called upon to consider arguments very similar to the one advanced here. For example, in Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Id. at 324 U. S. 600 . Similarly, in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
State can regulate retail rates at which gas can be sold within the State. E.g., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
federal scrutiny. Particularly relevant in this connection in this Court's decision in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
that Congress desired regulation by federal authority, rather than nonregulation. See Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
interest lies necessarily involves deductions based on the expert knowledge of the agency. See Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
price will result in scarcity to other consumers and a general price increase. Cf. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
acted irrationally in concluding that Con. Ed.'s proof was insufficient. See Charleston & Western Carolina R. Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Together with No. 46, National Coal Association et al. v. TranscontinentalSearch
-
error for the Commission to refuse to consider certain factors within its power of notice. E.g., City of Pittsburgh v. FederalSearch
-
Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. in Opposition to the Petition for Certiorari, pp. 24-30, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Cf. United States v. DetroitSearch
-
pertain to the preemption of pipeline capacity. Note 4, supra. Finally, we have held in Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. TranscontinentalSearch
-
Federal Power Commission v. TranscontinentalSearch
-
United States v. DetroitSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. ParkerSearch
-
and Federal Power Commission v. EastSearch
-
See Public Utilities Commission of Ohio v. UnitedSearch
-
See Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Compare Guss v. UtahSearch
-
State. See Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. CalvertSearch
-
Pipe Line Co. v. MichiganSearch
-
See Atlantic Refining Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
the State. E.g., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
-
See Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. FederalSearch
-
Cf. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. PublicSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial