Citation network
Pugach Vs. Dollinger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 27, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 458 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Pugach v. DollingerSearch
-
U.S. 458 (1961) Pugach v. DollingerSearch
-
of the Federal Communications Act. Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 117 . 277 F.2d 739 affirmed. PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 199 , and Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
U. S. 117 . MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would also affirm, but solely on the authority of Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
Page 365 U. S. 459 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE concurs, dissenting. In Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
Id., 344 U. S. 202 . The later decision of this Court in Benanti v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 355 U. S. 96 , swept away that rationale, and Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
rule -- against the criminal acts of those who bear the badge of the law is neither easy nor generous. Cf. Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 42 -44 (dissenting opinion). Yet today a majority of this Court summarily holds that Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
trial, petitioner is without remedy for the prejudice it does him in that trial, either in the state courts, People v. VarianoSearch
-
N.Y.2d 391, 185 N.Y.S.2d 1, 157 N.E.2d 857, or, under Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
supra, in the federal courts. In Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
commencement of the state court proceedings, as well as an injunction directly against the state court, Harkrader v. WadleySearch
-
use of wiretap evidence, not to enjoin the action itself. Hence, there is no bar to maintaining the action. Cf. Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
Hale v. BimcoSearch
-
language which clothes the denial of a right in the guise of a mere procedural decision. Unless and until Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
See Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
Weiss v. UnitedSearch
-
Benanti v. UnitedSearch
-
Goldstein v. UnitedSearch
-
Rathbun v. UnitedSearch
-
on wiretap evidence. The witness who divulges wiretap information is no less guilty of a federal crime. See Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
of Telephone Communications, 23 Misc.2d 543, 198 N.Y.S.2d 572. As I indicated in my dissent in Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
of Congress, (2) where necessary in aid of jurisdiction, and (3) to protect or effectuate its judgments. Cf. Toucey v. NewSearch
-
the first line of defense for federally secured rights. As respects federally secured civil rights see, e.g., Truax v. RaichSearch
-
Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
Hague v. CIOSearch
-
Douglas v. JeannetteSearch
-
U. S. 157 . As respects federally secured economic rights, see, e.g., Hynes v. GrimesSearch
-
Cline v. FrinkSearch
-
Hygrade Provision Co. v. ShermanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Pugach v. DollingerSearch
-
of Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
and Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
of Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
In Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
and Schwartz v. TexasSearch
-
Cf. Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
People v. VarianoSearch
-
In Stefanelli v. MinardSearch
-
Cf. Rea v. UnitedSearch
-
Goldstein v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial