Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wilkinson Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 27, 1961

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 4 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Beauharnais Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1952
  2. United States Vs. Cruikshank US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1875
  3. United States Vs. Harriss US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1954
  4. United States Vs. Rumely US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1953
  5. Wilkinson v. United
    Search
  6. States - 365 U.S. 399 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Wilkinson v. United
    Search
  7. States, 365 U.S. 399 (1961) Wilkinson v. United
    Search
  8. in the South and Communist propaganda activities in the South was clearly authorized by Congress. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  9. The Subcommittee's interrogation of petitioner did not violate his rights under the First Amendment. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  10. His conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, which held that our decision in Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  11. the subject under inquiry by a subcommittee at any given hearing. This the Court had occasion to point out in Watkins v. United
    Search
  12. States, 354 U. S. 178 . See also Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  13. The question of basic congressional authorization was clearly decided in Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  14. See Braden v. United
    Search
  15. ever did or said anything that could be understood as an objection upon grounds of lack of pertinency. See Watkins v. United
    Search
  16. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  17. from that upheld in Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  18. many people in our society who will have the courage to speak out against such a formidable opponent. But cf. Uphaus v. Wyman
    Search
  19. In my dissenting opinion in Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  20. Communist Party of United States v. Subversive
    Search
  21. Mesarosh v. United
    Search
  22. U.S. at 360 U. S. 126 . Cf. American Communications Assn. v. Douds
    Search
  23. Mr. Justice Brandeis made this very point in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. California
    Search
  24. than freedom of speech and press. Bringing people together in peaceable assemblies is in the same category. De Jonge v. State
    Search
  25. De Jonge v. State
    Search
  26. is to be found in an Act or Resolution, Congress should unequivocally authorize it. United States v. Rumely
    Search
  27. Watkins v. United
    Search
  28. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting. For the reasons stated in my Brother DOUGLAS' dissenting opinion in Braden v. United
    Search
  29. afford any basis for a hope that he might have repented, an inference which, by contrast, was possible in Flaxer v. United
    Search
  30. to the view that the questions asked of petitioner were therefore not within the Committee's power. Cf. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Wilkinson v. United
    Search
  32. Congress. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  33. the First Amendment. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  34. See Watkins v. United
    Search
  35. Communist Party of United States v. Subversive
    Search
  36. Cf. American Communications Assn. v. Douds
    Search
  37. Whitney v. California
    Search
  38. Braden v. United
    Search
  39. Flaxer v. United
    Search
  40. Cf. Barenblatt v. United
    Search
  41. Uphaus v. Wyman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial