Citation network
Ferguson Vs. Georgia
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 27, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 570 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Ferguson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U.S. 570 (1961) Ferguson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Powell v. StateSearch
-
requirements of due process in that regard as imposed upon the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. See also Chandler v. FretagSearch
-
State v. BarrowsSearch
-
Me. 401, 409. See Benson v. UnitedSearch
-
Here, as in England, criminal defendants were deemed incompetent as witnesses. In Rex v. LukensSearch
-
Doe v. WinnSearch
-
the incompetency rule for criminal defendants long before it was given statutory form by the Act of 1866. See Jones v. StateSearch
-
Roberts v. StateSearch
-
People v. ThomasSearch
-
Mich. 314, 320-321 (concurring opinion). See also Ruloff v. PeopleSearch
-
People v. TylerSearch
-
State v. CameronSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to take the stand. The early cases particularly emphasized the importance of such limitations. See, e.g., Staples v. StateSearch
-
Price v. CommonwealthSearch
-
State v. TaylorSearch
-
Reg. v. DyerSearch
-
Cox C.C. 113, 114. See also Reg. v. MalingsSearch
-
Reg. v. WalklingSearch
-
Reg. v. ManzanoSearch
-
Reg. v. WilliamsSearch
-
Cox C.C. 363. Judge Stephen's sponsorship of the practice was especially influential. See Reg. v. DohertySearch
-
Cox C.C. 306. See also Reg. v. ShimminSearch
-
statute of 1868, it provided that the prisoner should be subject to cross-examination on his statement. See People v. ThomasSearch
-
Coxwell v. StateSearch
-
State v. LouviereSearch
-
Rex v. KrafchenkoSearch
-
Rex v. ZwareSearch
-
Rex v. McKennaSearch
-
Bird v. StateSearch
-
Underwood v. StateSearch
-
Vaughn v. StateSearch
-
is not evidence, even the charge in the strict terms of the statute favored by the Georgia Supreme Court, see Garrett v. StateSearch
-
Emmett v. StateSearch
-
under oath. Moreover, charge after charge going beyond the terms of the statute has been sustained. Thus, in Garrett v. StateSearch
-
In Emmett v. StateSearch
-
In Douberly v. StateSearch
-
In Allen v. StateSearch
-
Darden v. StateSearch
-
Klug v. StateSearch
-
Poppell v. StateSearch
-
Ga. 276, 278. See also Grimes v. StateSearch
-
Thurmond v. StateSearch
-
Willingham v. StateSearch
-
Millen v. StateSearch
-
Because it is not evidence, the statement is not a foundation supporting the offer of corroborative evidence. Champman v. StateSearch
-
Medlin v. StateSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ferguson v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial