Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Chapman Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 03, 1961

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 2 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Rabinowitz US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1950
  2. United States Vs. Jeffers US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1951
  3. Chapman v. United
    Search
  4. States - 365 U.S. 610 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Chapman v. United
    Search
  5. States, 365 U.S. 610 (1961) Chapman v. United
    Search
  6. had any warrant of any kind. Although the decisions below were rendered prior to this Court's decision in Elkins v. United
    Search
  7. Until Agnello v. United
    Search
  8. Id. at 269 U. S. 33 . At least two decisions of this Court are closely relevant. Taylor v. United
    Search
  9. States, 286 U. S. 1 , and Johnson v. United
    Search
  10. U.S. at 333 U. S. 15 . See also Lustig v. United
    Search
  11. Jones v. United
    Search
  12. Johnson v. United
    Search
  13. Kilgore v. Paschall
    Search
  14. to contribute to clarification. The reasoning by which the Court reaches its result would be warranted were Trupiano v. United
    Search
  15. a short-lived deviation from the course of decisions preceding it, and it was specifically overruled by United States v. Rabinowitz
    Search
  16. case expresses the prevailing view, the decision in this case runs counter to it. The Court does rely on Johnson v. United
    Search
  17. would not acquire that knowledge by reading the only Georgia case to which the Court's opinion refers, Kilgore v. Paschall
    Search
  18. a landlord. In joining the Court's judgment, I do so on the basis of the views set forth in my dissents in Davis v. United
    Search
  19. Zap v. United
    Search
  20. Harris v. United
    Search
  21. that a landlord may, under the circumstances here, enter on his premises. Instead, it bases its reversal on Taylor v. United
    Search
  22. into a home without a search warrant when there was ample time to secure one. This doctrine, established by Trupiano v. United
    Search
  23. States, 334 U. S. 699 (1948), was repudiated and specifically overruled only two years later in United States v. Rabinowitz
    Search
  24. Likewise, Kilgore v. Paschall
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Chapman v. United
    Search
  26. Elkins v. United
    Search
  27. Taylor v. United
    Search
  28. and Johnson v. United
    Search
  29. Lustig v. United
    Search
  30. Trupiano v. United
    Search
  31. Davis v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial