Citation network
Kossick Vs. United Fruit
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 17, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Kossick v. UnitedSearch
-
Fruit - 365 U.S. 731 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Kossick v. UnitedSearch
-
Fruit, 365 U.S. 731 (1961) Kossick v. UnitedSearch
-
a contract to repair, Endner v. GrecoSearch
-
F. 411, or to insure a ship, Insurance Co. v. DunhamSearch
-
Wall. 1, is maritime, but a contract to build a ship is not. People's Ferry Co. v. BeersSearch
-
A suit on a bond covering cargo on general average is governed by admiralty law, Cie. Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. BonnasseSearch
-
F.2d 777, while an agreement to pay damages for another's breach of a maritime charter is not, Pacific Surety Co. v. LeathamSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and cure, which has been held to be a maritime Page 365 U. S. 736 contract. Methodist Episcopal Hospital v. PacificSearch
-
a duty created by and known only in admiralty as a kind of fringe benefit to the maritime contract of hire. See Cortes v. BaltimoreSearch
-
him without just cause, cannot further hold the shipowner to his duty to provide maintenance and cure. Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
Luth v. PalmerSearch
-
Calmar S.S. Corp. v. TaylorSearch
-
cure was not available at such hospital. Cf. Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
in the sense that the application of state law would not disturb the uniformity of maritime law, Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
of the uniformity and supremacy of the maritime law have been vigorously criticized -- see Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
the fact that maritime law is -- in a special sense, at least, Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
lose all concern for the longshoreman's status and wellbeing. In allowing state wrongful death statutes, The Tungus v. SkovgaardSearch
-
The Hamilton, 207 U. S. 398 , and state survival of actions statutes, Just v. ChambersSearch
-
in the scheme of maritime law. Altogether analogous reasoning was used by Mr. Justice Brandeis in Red Cross Line v. AtlanticSearch
-
effective remedy for that available in admiralty. The line of cases descended from the early precedent of Cooley v. BoardSearch
-
of Wardens, 12 How. 299, and most recently added to by Huron Portland Cement Co. v. DetroitSearch
-
Kelly v. WashingtonSearch
-
some presumption in favor of applying that law tending toward the validation of the alleged contract. Pritchard v. NortonSearch
-
Huron Portland Cement Co. v. DetroitSearch
-
York law here would be to invalidate the contract, this case can hardly be analogized to cases such as Red Cross Line v. AtlanticSearch
-
Fruit or Just v. ChambersSearch
-
U. S. 742 the remedies available in admiralty for the vindication of maritime rights. Nor is Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman'sSearch
-
Although the question has not often been litigated, Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSearch
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American-HawaiianSearch
-
Quirk v. ClintonSearch
-
Northern Star S.S. Co. of Canada v. KansasSearch
-
failure to stress force of custom in maritime matters is found in Union Fish Co. v. EricksonSearch
-
Navios Tanques, Ltd. v. HvalfslskSearch
-
of more lasting dissatisfaction and disharmony within a particular area of the law than Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
steadily narrowed in application, as is strikingly illustrated by such a tour de force as our decision in Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Kossick v. UnitedSearch
-
Endner v. GrecoSearch
-
Insurance Co. v. DunhamSearch
-
People's Ferry Co. v. BeersSearch
-
Vapeur v. BonnasseSearch
-
Pacific Surety Co. v. LeathamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial