Citation network
In Re Anastaplo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 24, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
committee in its proper functions of interrogating and cross-examining him upon his qualifications. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
under the Fourteenth Amendment to refuse to answer questions concerning membership in the Communist Party. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
the opinion of the Court. The questions presented by this case are similar to those involved in No. 28, Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
In 1957, following this Court's decisions in the earlier Konigsberg case, 353 U. S. 252 , and in Schware v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. 968, and set the matter for argument along with the Konigsberg case, p. 366 U. S. 36 , and Cohen v. HurleySearch
-
Page 366 U. S. 91 Cf. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
as to them, the Committee could not, as it did not, draw an unfavorable inference from refusal to answer. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
the significance of the applicant's views as to the overthrow of government by force in the light of Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
Bar of California, 353 U. S. 252 , and Yates v. UnitedSearch
-
as a lawyer the orderly processes that lie at the roots of this country's legal and political system, cf. Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Garner v. LosSearch
-
American Communications Ass'n v. DoudsSearch
-
Party questions was still further brought home to Anastaplo by the fact that after this Court's decisions in Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
of Public Education, 357 U. S. 399 , and Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
which lead me to this conclusion are largely the same as those expressed in my dissenting opinion in Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
power as a general matter, without regard to the importance of its exercise in a particular case. For, in Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
is not a part of the record in this case, but we take judicial notice of it. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSearch
-
Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
the overthrow of the Government. Thus, the decision here, like that in Konigsberg, is contrary to Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
See Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Barsky v. BoardSearch
-
Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Wilkinson v. UnitedSearch
-
Braden v. UnitedSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE BLACK's dissent. I add only that I think the judgment must also be reversed on the authority of Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
U. S. 513 , for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
the Communist Party. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
Schware v. BoardSearch
-
and Cohen v. HurleySearch
-
Cf. Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
of Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
and Yates v. UnitedSearch
-
Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
and Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSearch
-
Barsky v. BoardSearch
-
of Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
Uphaus v. WymanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial