Citation network
Alaska Vs. Arctic Maid
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 01, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Alaska v. ArcticSearch
-
Maid - 366 U.S. 199 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Alaska v. ArcticSearch
-
Maid, 366 U.S. 199 (1961) Alaska v. ArcticSearch
-
taxed Page 366 U. S. 202 locally any more than the loading and unloading of interstate carriers. Cf. Joseph v. CarterSearch
-
Richfield Oil Corp. v. StateSearch
-
to the new State of Alaska. 364 U.S. 811. We put to one side the specialized cases such as Richfield Oil Corp. v. StateSearch
-
the salmon involved in these cases was destined to a foreign country. We also consider irrelevant cases such as Joseph v. CarterSearch
-
as the Court said in Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. CalvertSearch
-
control activity within her territorial waters, at least in the absence of conflicting federal legislation. Skiriotes v. FloridaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
fishing in that manner and in that area, as Congress had not adopted any inconsistent regulation. See also Toomer v. WitsellSearch
-
Ott v. MississippiSearch
-
U. S. 166 ) in a vivid sense of the term. We see no reason why our cases involving the taking of shrimp ( Toomer v. WitsellSearch
-
supra ) and the extraction of ore ( Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. LordSearch
-
is computed, it did not exceed the six-percent tax on the local canners. Hence, cases such as Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
between taxes laid by a State on different types of business is necessary. Caskey Baking Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
power to deny what is a necessary local incident of the right to make interstate purchases. See York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySearch
-
fish for interstate markets than it places on the obtaining and freezing of fish for local markets. See Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Alaska v. ArcticSearch
-
Cf. Joseph v. CarterSearch
-
Joseph v. CarterSearch
-
Skiriotes v. FloridaSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
-
Caskey Baking Co. v. VirginiaSearch
-
See York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySearch
-
See Pennsylvania v. WestSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial