Citation network
Two Guys Vs. Mcginley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 582 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Two Guys v. McGinleySearch
-
U.S. 582 (1961) Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySearch
-
U. S. 583 4. The 1959 Act does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
whether it is a law respecting an establishment of religion, within the meaning of the First Amendment. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
that Act is not a law respecting an establishment of religion within the meaning of the First Amendment. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
to accomplish its secular purpose that would not even remotely or incidentally give state aid to religion. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
guarantees of equal protection of the laws and religious freedom. This case is essentially the same as McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
in declining to pass on the constitutionality of the 1939 statute for the reasons stated. Railroad Commission v. PullmanSearch
-
Page 366 U. S. 590 The standards for evaluating these contentions have been set out in McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
interference with the absolute tranquility of the day is justified by their requirement and desirability. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
also alleges that the statute discriminates against certain religions. For the same reasons stated in McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
the Pennsylvania courts in interpreting the statutes. We agree that an inquiry into these matters is relevant. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
Specht Page 366 U. S. 597 v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Superior Court affirmed an opinion which specifically relied on the language and reasoning of Specht. Commonwealth v. BauderSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Act immediately before us, we hold that neither the statute's purpose nor its effect is religious. See McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
supra, at p. 366 U. S. 449 . Moreover, for the same reasons stated in McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
that appellant also has standing to raise the second contention and that the claim is without merit. See McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
See Johnston v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Commonwealth v. NesbitSearch
-
Visitation of Sick v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Sparhawk v. UnionSearch
-
Commonwealth v. AmericanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Two Guys v. McGinleySearch
-
Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySearch
-
the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
of the First Amendment. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
Railroad Commission v. PullmanSearch
-
of Specht. Commonwealth v. BauderSearch
-
See McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
Visitation of Sick v. CommonwealthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial