Citation network
Communist Party Vs. Sacb
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 05, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Communist Party v. SACBSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1961) Communist Party of the United States v. SubversiveSearch
-
affecting their rights were prematurely raised, and will not be considered at this time. Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
do not constitute a restraint of freedom of expression and association in violation of the First Amendment. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Bates v. LittleSearch
-
of the Board enjoined. A statutory three-judge court denied preliminary relief, Communist Party of the United States v. McGrathSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
denied the motion and affirmed the order of the Board, one judge dissenting. Communist Party of the United States v. SubversiveSearch
-
of several documents relating to Mrs. Markward's testimony, and remanded. Communist Party of the United States v. SubversiveSearch
-
to order production could not be corrected on petition to review the Board's order. Relying on Consolidated Edison Co. v. LaborSearch
-
by the administrative agency charged with its enforcement is to be given weight by a reviewing court. Cf. Labor Board v. HearstSearch
-
Publications, Inc., 322 U. S. 111 . Our decision in Rochester Telephone Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
defines. In this context, the Party misapplies Yates v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 354 U. S. 298 , and Dennis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 341 U. S. 494 , on which it relies. See Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
record before it, to appraise the probative force of the evidence in each dimension. See Secretary of Agriculture v. CentralSearch
-
We think that the Court of Appeals did not err in refusing to remand the case on that ground. Cf. Labor Board v. NewportSearch
-
not rely on, or even refer to, the finding of secret practices. Thus, this case is unlike Securities & Exchange Comm'n v. ChenerySearch
-
Corp., 318 U. S. 80 , and Labor Board v. VirginiaSearch
-
purport to rely, it would be an unwarranted exercise of reviewing power to remand for further proceedings. Labor Board v. ReedSearch
-
and we find no purpose to be served in departing now from this settled policy of appellate review. Labor Board v. PittsburghSearch
-
Labor Board v. AmericanSearch
-
Federal Trade Comm'n v. StandardSearch
-
the First Amendment rights of free expression and association of the Communist Party and its adherents. See NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
if the Party fails to register or fails to list them. Cf. Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
Quinn v. UnitedSearch
-
are attacked as a penalty on the exercise of, the Party's constitutionally protected freedom of speech. Cf. Talley v. CaliforniaSearch
-
are said to deny those members due process of law by, in effect, attainting them by association, cf. De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
a justiciable controversy in which the nature and extent of those rights may be litigated. United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
International Longshoremen's Union v. BoydSearch
-
Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia S.S. Co. v. CommissionersSearch
-
Arizona v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Mr. Justice Brandeis, concurring, in Ashwander v. TennesseeSearch
-
can most wisely determine issues precisely defined by the confining circumstances of particular situations. See Parker v. CountySearch
-
Rescue Army v. MunicipalSearch
-
Massachusetts v. MellonSearch
-
the Board's registration order. A closely similar issue was presented to this Court in Electric Bond & Share Co. v. SecuritiesSearch
-
withdraw from profitable relations or associations with the litigants. See, e.g., Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Communist Party v. SACBSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial