Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

irvIn Vs. Dowd

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 05, 1961

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 8 linked 36 unlinked
Show
  1. Palko Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · Dec 06, 1937
  2. Tumey Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Mar 07, 1927
  3. Lisenba Vs. California US Supreme Court · Dec 08, 1941
  4. Spies Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Nov 02, 1887
  5. Shepherd Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Apr 09, 1951
  6. Moore Vs. Dempsey US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1923
  7. Mahler Vs. Eby US Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1924
  8. Dowd Vs. Cook US Supreme Court · Jan 02, 1951
  9. U.S. 717 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  10. U.S. 717 (1960) Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  11. of death in the Circuit Court of Gibson County, Indiana. The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the conviction in Irvin v. State
    Search
  12. The Page 366 U. S. 721 Court of Appeals upheld its validity. However, in the light of Gannon v. Porter
    Search
  13. has said that the Fourteenth Amendment does not demand the use of jury trials in a State's criminal procedure, Fay v. New
    Search
  14. Co.Litt. 155b. His verdict must be based upon the evidence developed at the trial. Cf. Thompson v. City
    Search
  15. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  16. the juror can lay aside his impression or opinion and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court. Spies v. Illinois
    Search
  17. Holt v. United
    Search
  18. At p. 98 U. S. 157 . As was stated in Brown v. Allen
    Search
  19. his opinion, he could render an impartial verdict. But, as Chief Justice Hughes observed in United States v. Wood
    Search
  20. shown to be present throughout the community, cf. Stroble v. California
    Search
  21. is so persistent that it unconsciously fights detachment from the mental processes of the average man. See Delaney v. United
    Search
  22. in which two-thirds of the members admit, before hearing any testimony, to possessing a belief in his guilt. Stroble v. California
    Search
  23. the District Court should enter such orders as are appropriate and consistent with this opinion, cf. Grandsinger v. Bovey
    Search
  24. F.Supp. 201, 240, which allow the State a reasonable time in which to retry petitioner. Cf. Chessman v. Teets
    Search
  25. are sometimes so powerful that an accused is forced, as a practical matter, to forego trial by jury. See Maryland v. Baltimore
    Search
  26. was only a week ago, to reverse a conviction in which prejudicial newspaper intrusion has poisoned the outcome. Janko v. United
    Search
  27. Marshall v. United
    Search
  28. States, 360 U. S. 310 . See also Stroble v. California
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  30. Irvin v. State
    Search
  31. of Gannon v. Porter
    Search
  32. Fay v. New
    Search
  33. Cf. Thompson v. City
    Search
  34. Brown v. Allen
    Search
  35. United States v. Wood
    Search
  36. Stroble v. California
    Search
  37. See Delaney v. United
    Search
  38. Grandsinger v. Bovey
    Search
  39. Cf. Chessman v. Teets
    Search
  40. See Maryland v. Baltimore
    Search
  41. Janko v. United
    Search
  42. Marshall v. United
    Search
  43. Hopt v. Utah
    Search
  44. Tod v. Waldman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial