Citation network
Lathrop Vs. Donohue
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 820 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Lathrop v. DonohueSearch
-
U.S. 820 (1961) Lathrop v. DonohueSearch
-
Bar and to pay reasonable annual dues, they do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSearch
-
King Manufacturing Co. v. CitySearch
-
Thus, this Court has upheld jurisdiction on appeal of challenges to municipal ordinances, e.g., King Manufacturing Co. v. CitySearch
-
certain types of orders of state regulatory commission, e.g., Lake Erie & Western R. Co. v. StateSearch
-
and some Page 367 U. S. 825 orders of other state agencies, e.g., Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
to all present members of the Bar and to all persons coming within the described class in the future. Cf. Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
We therefore are confronted, as we were in Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSearch
-
of group activities, not with involuntary membership in any other aspect. Cf. International Association of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
a claim of impingement upon freedom of association no different from that which we decided in Railway Employes' Dept. v. HansonSearch
-
similar to the legislative activities of which the appellant complains. See International Association of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
more concretely presented for adjudication than it was in Hanson. Compare International Association of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. C.ISearch
-
O., 335 U. S. 106 , 335 U. S. 126 (concurring opinion). Cf. United States v. U.ASearch
-
S. 848 he opposes. That issue is reserved, just as it was in Hanson, see International Association of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
which the State, through its courts, has traditionally exercised over admission to the practice of law, see Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
In re Anastaplo, 366 U. S. 82 , and over the conduct of lawyers after admission, see Cohen v. HurleySearch
-
assured by the Fourteenth Amendment, see NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
of dues could not be made the basis of limiting the profession of law to the comparatively wealthy. Cf. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
lawyers. But neither activity is the kind of direct self-regulation that was stricken down in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Pacific States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. OregonSearch
-
to a compelled affirmation of belief of the sort this Court struck down in West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
an organization. Mr Justice Cardozo, writing for himself, Mr. Justice Brandeis, and Mr. Justice Stone in Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
impingement upon such freedoms may fairly be said to draw in question governmental action. See, e.g., Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Konigsberg v. StateSearch
-
Dulles v. JohnsonSearch
-
me that a reasonable license tax can be imposed on the profession of being a lawyer, doctor, dentist, etc. See Royall v. VirginiaSearch
-
Wyoming. See note 14, dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER in International Association of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
question involved in both of them, it is this case and the companion case of International Association of Machinists v. StreetSearch
-
Were it not for this Court's recent decision in Cohen v. HurleySearch
-
Brown v. WesternSearch
-
relied upon by the plurality opinion certainly do not support its position. The concurring opinion in United States v. C.ISearch
-
issues should be thrown out of court completely for his failure. And the decision of the Court in United States v. InternationalSearch
-
is set out in American Communications Ass'n v. DoudsSearch
-
Dennis v. UnitedSearch
-
Barenblatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Wilkinson v. UnitedSearch
-
Scales v. UnitedSearch
-
Communist Party v. SubversiveSearch
-
Braden v. UnitedSearch
-
American Communications Ass'n v. DoudsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lathrop v. DonohueSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment. Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSearch
-
Lake Erie & Western R. Co. v. StateSearch
-
Cf. Hamilton v. RegentsSearch
-
Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial