Citation network
Culombe Vs. Connecticut
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1961
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 568 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
U.S. 568 (1961) Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
independent labor of its officers, not by the simple, cruel expedient of forcing it from his own lips. See Blackburn v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Consistently with that Amendment, neither the body nor mind of an accused may be twisted until he breaks. Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
the all-night grilling of prisoners under circumstances of sustained, week-long terror, we have rejected it. Chambers v. FloridaSearch
-
such detention and examination of a suspect as, under all the circumstances, is found not to be coercive. See Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Stein v. NewSearch
-
Gay, 357 U. S. 504 . And see Townsend v. BurkeSearch
-
In 1943, this Court, in McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
Upshaw v. UnitedSearch
-
cases, we have not extended its rule to state prosecutions as a requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gallegos v. NebraskaSearch
-
Lyons v. OklahomaSearch
-
in the proceeding when the prisoner is still only a suspect -- prohibited by several state statutes. See Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
and his capacity for self-determination critically impaired, the use of his confession offends due process. Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
the one caveat, necessarily, that we are not to be bound by findings wholly lacking support in evidence. See Thompson v. LouisvilleSearch
-
the evidence for the defense as, fairly read in the context of the record as a whole, remains uncontradicted. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSearch
-
Thomas v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 51 (opinion of Frankfurter, J.), the matter of description, too, is necessarily open here. See Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
If these were coerced, Culombe's conviction, however convincingly supported by other evidence, cannot stand. Malinski v. NewSearch
-
York, 324 U. S. 401 . Stroble v. CaliforniaSearch
-
that time, far from resisting, Culombe was wholly cooperating with the police. Similarly, our decisions in Haley v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 596 , and Blackburn v. AlabamaSearch
-
to him powers of resistance comparable to those which the Court found possessed by the defendant Cooper in Stein v. NewSearch
-
or the defendant James in Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
have found to be voluntary confessions given after several hours questioning or less on the day of arrest. See Stroble v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Culombe v. ConnecticutSearch
-
See Blackburn v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
See Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gallegos v. NebraskaSearch
-
See Thompson v. LouisvilleSearch
-
and Blackburn v. AlabamaSearch
-
Lisenba v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Stroble v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Rogers v. RichmondSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial