Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Piemonte Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 19, 1961

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 2 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Monia US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1943
  2. Counselman Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1892
  3. Piemonte v. United
    Search
  4. States - 367 U.S. 556 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Piemonte v. United
    Search
  5. States, 367 U.S. 556 (1961) Piemonte v. United
    Search
  6. the conviction is sustained. Reina v. United
    Search
  7. Page 367 U. S. 558 The section's breadth and constitutionality were considered earlier this Term in Reina v. United
    Search
  8. citizen, of course, owes to his society the duty of giving testimony to aid in the enforcement of the law. See Brown v. Walker
    Search
  9. on the ground that a federal district judge has no power to impose such punishment in a summary proceeding. See Green v. United
    Search
  10. Reina v. United
    Search
  11. the type of harassment which violates the spirit of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Cf. Abbate v. United
    Search
  12. Ciucci v. State
    Search
  13. courts to rectify the abuse of the summary contempt power which the record in this case makes manifest. See Offutt v. United
    Search
  14. judges to use the summary contempt power as a device for imposing long terms of imprisonment. See, e.g., Reina v. United
    Search
  15. Brown v. United
    Search
  16. Green v. United
    Search
  17. Collins v. United
    Search
  18. Tedesco v. United
    Search
  19. Corona v. United
    Search
  20. summary contempt power was seldom used to impose more than a nominal fine or a short term of imprisonment. See Brown v. United
    Search
  21. the proceedings of this grand jury became a part of a criminal prosecution directed against petitioner. Counselman v. Hitchcock
    Search
  22. no pressure of government, no threats of the prosecution can be used to deprive the citizen of this right. See Wilson v. United
    Search
  23. Stewart v. United
    Search
  24. court in a summary proceeding. That was the view stated by MR. JUSTICE BLACK in his dissenting opinion in Green v. United
    Search
  25. See Watkins v. United
    Search
  26. See Hirabayashi v. United
    Search
  27. Korematsu v. United
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Piemonte v. United
    Search
  29. See Brown v. Walker
    Search
  30. See Green v. United
    Search
  31. of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Cf. Abbate v. United
    Search
  32. See Offutt v. United
    Search
  33. See Brown v. United
    Search
  34. See Wilson v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial