Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hoyt Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 20, 1961

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 4 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Hernandez Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · May 03, 1954
  2. Norris Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1935
  3. Eubanks Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · May 26, 1958
  4. Cassell Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1950
  5. U.S. 57 (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Hoyt v. Florida
    Search
  6. U.S. 57 (1961) Hoyt v. Florida
    Search
  7. claim is made that the jury as constituted was otherwise afflicted by any elements of supposed unfairness. Cf. Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  8. those eligible in the community for jury service, untrammelled by any arbitrary and systematic exclusions. See Fay v. New
    Search
  9. accept appellant's invitation to canvass in this case the continuing validity of this Court's dictum in Strauder v. West
    Search
  10. constitutional proposition has gone unquestioned for more than eighty years in the decisions of the Court, see Fay v. New
    Search
  11. Fay v. New
    Search
  12. had volunteered for jury duty since the limitation of jury service to males, see Hall v. Florida
    Search
  13. found by this Court to compel a conclusion of purposeful discriminatory exclusions from jury service. E.g., Hernandez v. Texas
    Search
  14. Smith v. Texas
    Search
  15. Hill v. Texas
    Search
  16. of any plan to place on it only women of a particular economic or other community or organizational group. Cf. Thiel v. Southern
    Search
  17. Glasser v. United
    Search
  18. States, 315 U. S. 60 , 315 U. S. 83 -87. And see also Fay v. New
    Search
  19. of the jury laws, proportional class representation is not a constitutionally required factor. See Akins v. Texas
    Search
  20. undertaken to exclude women from jury service, a showing which it was incumbent on appellant to make, Hernandez v. Texas
    Search
  21. York, supra, at 332 U. S. 285 , we must sustain the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Cf. Akins v. Texas
    Search
  22. whether they were eligible for jury service under the law of the State where the federal tribunal sat. See Ballard v. United
    Search
  23. statute was to make women eligible for federal jury service even though ineligible under state law. See United States v. Wilson
    Search
  24. F.2d 686. There is no indication that such congressional action was impelled by constitutional considerations. Cf. Fay v. New
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Hoyt v. Florida
    Search
  26. Cf. Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  27. See Fay v. New
    Search
  28. Strauder v. West
    Search
  29. Hall v. Florida
    Search
  30. E.g., Hernandez v. Texas
    Search
  31. Cf. Thiel v. Southern
    Search
  32. See Akins v. Texas
    Search
  33. of the Supreme Court of Florida. Cf. Akins v. Texas
    Search
  34. See Ballard v. United
    Search
  35. See United States v. Wilson
    Search
  36. Cf. Fay v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial